CJEU Case Law and the Interplay with Policy and Legislative Action in the DSM

Eleonora Rosati
{"title":"CJEU Case Law and the Interplay with Policy and Legislative Action in the DSM","authors":"Eleonora Rosati","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198837176.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The final chapter tackles recent initiatives for a reform of the EU copyright acquis. In particular, it focuses on a number of selected areas in the proposed Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market (DSM), which require to be considered in light, not just of existing legislation, but also—and perhaps most importantly—existing case law. These areas are: the ‘value gap’ (‘transfer of value’) proposal, the press publishers’ right, fair compensation for private copying, and licensing of out-of-commerce works. The chapter discusses whether and to what extent the EU copyright reform may be regarded as a ‘codification’ of existing CJEU case law, or rather as a departure from it. Either way, the centrality of judicial interpretation of existing legislation is apparent also in the context of policy discourse.","PeriodicalId":313855,"journal":{"name":"Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union","volume":"176 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198837176.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The final chapter tackles recent initiatives for a reform of the EU copyright acquis. In particular, it focuses on a number of selected areas in the proposed Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market (DSM), which require to be considered in light, not just of existing legislation, but also—and perhaps most importantly—existing case law. These areas are: the ‘value gap’ (‘transfer of value’) proposal, the press publishers’ right, fair compensation for private copying, and licensing of out-of-commerce works. The chapter discusses whether and to what extent the EU copyright reform may be regarded as a ‘codification’ of existing CJEU case law, or rather as a departure from it. Either way, the centrality of judicial interpretation of existing legislation is apparent also in the context of policy discourse.
欧洲法院判例法与DSM中政策和立法行动的相互作用
最后一章讨论了欧盟版权收购改革的最新举措。特别地,它集中在数字单一市场(DSM)版权建议指令中选定的一些领域,这些领域不仅需要考虑现有立法,而且可能最重要的是考虑现有判例法。这些领域是:“价值差距”(“价值转移”)提案,新闻出版商的权利,私人复制的公平补偿,以及非商业作品的许可。本章讨论了欧盟版权改革是否以及在多大程度上可以被视为对现有欧洲法院判例法的“编纂”,或者更确切地说,是对现有判例法的背离。无论哪种方式,现行立法的司法解释的中心地位在政策话语的背景下也很明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信