Telecom and the Internet: Assessing the necessary degree of coherence between technology and institutions

W. Lemstra
{"title":"Telecom and the Internet: Assessing the necessary degree of coherence between technology and institutions","authors":"W. Lemstra","doi":"10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From research into the co-evolution of technology and institutions in the electricity sector system functions and coordination mechanisms have been identified as essential for the overall system integrity. When intervention in the autonomous development of the sector is being considered, e.g., through liberalization, their execution needs to be assured through institutional and/or technological means. Hence, a certain degree of coherence between technological and institutional arrangements needs to be safeguarded. In this contribution we report in summary form on the applicability of the coherence hypothesis for the electronic communications sector. We explore the co-evolution of the voice network (PSTN) and the data network (Internet), and assess the implications of the Telecom Reform as an deliberate intervention in the development process. We conclude that for the sector the coherence hypothesis can neither be accepted, nor rejected. What appears to distinguish the sectors are the attributes of the products/services provided, and the characteristics of the design regime applied. Identifiers are categorized as being coordination critical.","PeriodicalId":207041,"journal":{"name":"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

From research into the co-evolution of technology and institutions in the electricity sector system functions and coordination mechanisms have been identified as essential for the overall system integrity. When intervention in the autonomous development of the sector is being considered, e.g., through liberalization, their execution needs to be assured through institutional and/or technological means. Hence, a certain degree of coherence between technological and institutional arrangements needs to be safeguarded. In this contribution we report in summary form on the applicability of the coherence hypothesis for the electronic communications sector. We explore the co-evolution of the voice network (PSTN) and the data network (Internet), and assess the implications of the Telecom Reform as an deliberate intervention in the development process. We conclude that for the sector the coherence hypothesis can neither be accepted, nor rejected. What appears to distinguish the sectors are the attributes of the products/services provided, and the characteristics of the design regime applied. Identifiers are categorized as being coordination critical.
电信和互联网:评估技术和制度之间必要的一致性程度
从研究到电力部门的技术和制度的共同演变,系统功能和协调机制已被确定为整个系统完整性的必要条件。当考虑通过自由化干预该部门的自主发展时,需要通过体制和(或)技术手段确保其执行。因此,需要保障技术安排和体制安排之间的某种程度的一致性。在这篇文章中,我们以摘要的形式报告了相干假设对电子通信部门的适用性。我们探讨了语音网络(PSTN)和数据网络(互联网)的共同演变,并评估了电信改革在发展过程中有意干预的影响。我们的结论是,对于部门的连贯性假设既不能接受,也不能拒绝。区分这些部门的似乎是所提供的产品/服务的属性,以及所应用的设计制度的特征。标识符被归类为协调关键的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信