Experimental Investigation of Amphoteric and Microbial Surfactants for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shaly Sandstones

Rishabh Pandey, A. Tinni, C. Rai
{"title":"Experimental Investigation of Amphoteric and Microbial Surfactants for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shaly Sandstones","authors":"Rishabh Pandey, A. Tinni, C. Rai","doi":"10.2118/213102-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n To meet the increasing demand for oil and gas, surfactants have been used to increase hydrocarbon recovery. Use of surfactants reduces the Interfacial Tension (IFT) at fluid/fluid interface and wettability at rock/fluid interface and mobilizes trapped oil out of the pores. However, there are two main limitations of the surfactant flooding process—first, high reservoir temperature & salinity, and second, adsorption of surfactants on the rock surface. Surfactant adsorption alters wettability of reservoir rock from oil-wet to water-wet. However, it may not increase oil recovery, especially in conventional reservoirs with high Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and temperature due to excess surfactant adsorption. This study tested two synthetic amphoteric surfactants, one nonionic biosurfactant, and a base case with produced brine to understand wettability, IFT, surfactant adsorption, and their effect on oil recovery in shaly sandstone formation. Produced brine has a TDS of 238,000 ppm. First, surfactant stability tests were performed on the three surfactants. Then, IFT measurements were performed between crude oil and surfactant solutions along with produced brine. Next, wettability alteration was studied by measuring contact angle on oil saturated rock samples before and after being exposed with surfactants and produced brine. Then, surfactant adsorption experiments were performed using UV-Vis spectrophotometer to calculate the amount of surfactant adsorbed on the rock sample. Next, surfactants and produced brine imbibition experiments were performed on plug samples at 145°F and 500 psi pressure, and oil recovery was quantified using 12MHz Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectrometer. Results showed that all three surfactants reduced IFT and altered wettability, but biosurfactant showed most reduction of IFT, much lower surfactant adsorption, and made the sample most water wet as compared to amphoteric surfactants. Imbibition experiments showed that biosurfactant have the highest oil recovery, while amphoteric surfactants have oil recovery even lower than produced brine. This study shows that surfactant adsorption effects oil recovery, which can lead to loss of surfactants from solution to the rock surface. This study suggests that biosurfactants with glycolipids can be effectively used in shaly sandstone at high TDS and temperature.","PeriodicalId":360081,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, April 18, 2023","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, April 18, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/213102-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To meet the increasing demand for oil and gas, surfactants have been used to increase hydrocarbon recovery. Use of surfactants reduces the Interfacial Tension (IFT) at fluid/fluid interface and wettability at rock/fluid interface and mobilizes trapped oil out of the pores. However, there are two main limitations of the surfactant flooding process—first, high reservoir temperature & salinity, and second, adsorption of surfactants on the rock surface. Surfactant adsorption alters wettability of reservoir rock from oil-wet to water-wet. However, it may not increase oil recovery, especially in conventional reservoirs with high Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and temperature due to excess surfactant adsorption. This study tested two synthetic amphoteric surfactants, one nonionic biosurfactant, and a base case with produced brine to understand wettability, IFT, surfactant adsorption, and their effect on oil recovery in shaly sandstone formation. Produced brine has a TDS of 238,000 ppm. First, surfactant stability tests were performed on the three surfactants. Then, IFT measurements were performed between crude oil and surfactant solutions along with produced brine. Next, wettability alteration was studied by measuring contact angle on oil saturated rock samples before and after being exposed with surfactants and produced brine. Then, surfactant adsorption experiments were performed using UV-Vis spectrophotometer to calculate the amount of surfactant adsorbed on the rock sample. Next, surfactants and produced brine imbibition experiments were performed on plug samples at 145°F and 500 psi pressure, and oil recovery was quantified using 12MHz Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectrometer. Results showed that all three surfactants reduced IFT and altered wettability, but biosurfactant showed most reduction of IFT, much lower surfactant adsorption, and made the sample most water wet as compared to amphoteric surfactants. Imbibition experiments showed that biosurfactant have the highest oil recovery, while amphoteric surfactants have oil recovery even lower than produced brine. This study shows that surfactant adsorption effects oil recovery, which can lead to loss of surfactants from solution to the rock surface. This study suggests that biosurfactants with glycolipids can be effectively used in shaly sandstone at high TDS and temperature.
两性表面活性剂和微生物表面活性剂提高泥质砂岩采收率的实验研究
为了满足日益增长的油气需求,表面活性剂已被用于提高油气采收率。表面活性剂的使用降低了流体/流体界面的界面张力(IFT)和岩石/流体界面的润湿性,并将被困的油从孔隙中释放出来。然而,表面活性剂驱有两个主要的局限性:一是储层温度和矿化度高,二是表面活性剂在岩石表面的吸附。表面活性剂的吸附改变了储层岩石的润湿性,使其由油湿型变为水湿型。然而,它可能不会提高采收率,特别是在常规油藏中,由于过量的表面活性剂吸附,总溶解固体(TDS)和温度都很高。该研究测试了两种合成两性表面活性剂、一种非离子型生物表面活性剂,以及一种含产出盐水的基本情况,以了解泥质砂岩地层的润湿性、IFT、表面活性剂吸附及其对采收率的影响。产出盐水的TDS为238,000 ppm。首先,对三种表面活性剂进行了稳定性试验。然后,在原油和表面活性剂溶液以及产出的盐水之间进行IFT测量。其次,通过测量含油岩石样品在表面活性剂和采出盐水暴露前后的接触角,研究润湿性变化。然后用紫外可见分光光度计进行表面活性剂吸附实验,计算表面活性剂在岩样上的吸附量。接下来,在145°F和500 psi的压力下,对桥塞样品进行表面活性剂和产出盐水的渗吸实验,并使用12MHz核磁共振(NMR)光谱仪对采收率进行量化。结果表明,与两性表面活性剂相比,生物表面活性剂对IFT的降低作用最大,表面活性剂的吸附作用更小,使样品更湿润。渗吸实验表明,生物表面活性剂的采收率最高,两性表面活性剂的采收率甚至低于采出盐水。研究表明,表面活性剂的吸附会影响采收率,导致表面活性剂从溶液中流失到岩石表面。研究结果表明,含糖脂的生物表面活性剂可以有效地应用于高温高温下的泥质砂岩中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信