Analysis of Quality Tests Created by FKIP-UHAMKA Faculty for Middle Semester in Academic Year 2016-2017

Sri Astuti, A. Kusdiwelirawan, S. Dahlia
{"title":"Analysis of Quality Tests Created by FKIP-UHAMKA Faculty for Middle Semester in Academic Year 2016-2017","authors":"Sri Astuti, A. Kusdiwelirawan, S. Dahlia","doi":"10.31758/OMEGAJPHYSPHYSEDUC.V4I1.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is to analyse the quality of test for midterm examination Academic Year 2016-2017 of FKIP UHAMKA lectures. The aims of the research were to identify the quality of the test on compulsory institutional courses academic year 2016-2017 and to analyse the weakness point of the lectures in the making of quality test based on the analysis of the test for midterm examination academic year 2016-2017. The method that used in this research was descriptive analysis method through documentation as a data collection technique. Subjects of this research were semester plan document (RPS) and items test were arranged by lectures. The data that will be analysed are consist of 6 courses, including essay and multiple choice questions. The object of the research was the quality of the items test considered by a few aspects that were learning achievement of RPS, substance of items test, items test structure, and culture/grammar. The instrument for data collection were rubric and researcher which were as human instrument. Overall, the result of this research was the items test have quality with level moderate to good. Furthermore, the majority of items test have weakness related to the making of items test which were the decription of indicators: the learning achievements (such as attitude, general and particular skills) and score list on the items test.","PeriodicalId":388876,"journal":{"name":"Omega: Jurnal Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega: Jurnal Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31758/OMEGAJPHYSPHYSEDUC.V4I1.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is to analyse the quality of test for midterm examination Academic Year 2016-2017 of FKIP UHAMKA lectures. The aims of the research were to identify the quality of the test on compulsory institutional courses academic year 2016-2017 and to analyse the weakness point of the lectures in the making of quality test based on the analysis of the test for midterm examination academic year 2016-2017. The method that used in this research was descriptive analysis method through documentation as a data collection technique. Subjects of this research were semester plan document (RPS) and items test were arranged by lectures. The data that will be analysed are consist of 6 courses, including essay and multiple choice questions. The object of the research was the quality of the items test considered by a few aspects that were learning achievement of RPS, substance of items test, items test structure, and culture/grammar. The instrument for data collection were rubric and researcher which were as human instrument. Overall, the result of this research was the items test have quality with level moderate to good. Furthermore, the majority of items test have weakness related to the making of items test which were the decription of indicators: the learning achievements (such as attitude, general and particular skills) and score list on the items test.
FKIP-UHAMKA学院2016-2017学年中期质量测试分析
本研究旨在分析FKIP UHAMKA 2016-2017学年期中考试的考试质量。本研究的目的是在分析2016-2017学年期中考试考试的基础上,确定2016-2017学年必修课程考试的质量,并分析教学质量考试的薄弱环节。本研究使用的方法是描述性分析方法,通过文献作为数据收集技术。本研究以学期计划文件(RPS)为研究对象,课目测验以讲座形式安排。将被分析的数据包括6门课程,包括论文和多项选择题。研究对象从RPS学习成绩、题项实质、题项结构、文化/语法等几个方面考察题项测试的质量。数据收集的工具是作为人的工具的标题和研究人员。总体而言,本研究的结果是项目测试具有中等至良好的质量水平。此外,大多数项目测试在项目测试的制作方面存在弱点,即对指标的描述:学习成就(如态度、一般技能和特殊技能)和项目测试的得分列表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信