Application and Performance Monitoring of Compound Air Plasma Lightning Rejection System

Agnes Yin Yee Ho, Dzulkarnain B Azaman, Umar Zakir Ahmad, Han Shen Chin
{"title":"Application and Performance Monitoring of Compound Air Plasma Lightning Rejection System","authors":"Agnes Yin Yee Ho, Dzulkarnain B Azaman, Umar Zakir Ahmad, Han Shen Chin","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22896-ea","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The objective of this paper is to share on the application and performance monitoring of Compound Air Plasma Lightning Rejection (CPLR) system at an onshore terminal facility. Malaysia is one of the top three countries in the world with high lightning density, recorded average of 13.9 flashes per square kilometer annually. Thus, the country's oil and gas industry is indeed vulnerable to the dangerous impact of lightning, often associated with risk like fire, explosion, and release of hazardous material. During the initial stage of lightning development, the air acts as an insulator between positive and negative charges at the cloud and ground. However, when the difference between charges is too great, the insulating capacity of the air breaks down, caused rapid discharge of electricity and resulting in a lightning formation. Upon detection of potential difference between storm cloud and ground, CPLR will release plasma ion, that in theory will neutralize the positive and negative ions and eventually prevent lightning to happen.\n This paper will discuss on the investigation outcome of two vent fire incidents at the produced water tanks of an oil and gas receiving facility at east coast of Malaysia, in relation with the functionality of this novel active lightning protection system. Detailed comparison has been made between CPLR lightning rejection data and the data from an electricity utility research company (TNB-Research) lightning mapping to study the system's reliability and effectiveness.\n During the first vent fire incident in 2018, data analysis showed that there was no lightning strike within the CPLR coverage area and suspected the lightning propagated from the nearest striking point in lightning mapping following the path of least resistance. In addition, this also surfaced up several installation issues such as insufficient protection coverage due to incorrect pole height design, communication card failure etc. Identified action items have been implemented to restore the CPLR system for tank lightning protection. After that, the system has been closely monitored for its performance and it showed reliable lightning rejection data in year 2020 with no vent fire occurence. However, the second vent fire incident happened in 2021. Post investigation, TNB-R data showed that the lightning stroke 200m from the produced water tank recorded peak current value at −68kA which was two times higher than the average lightning amperage. This concluded that CPLR was unable to reject propagated lightning of high magnitude as well.\n In overall, CPLR system is proved to be functioning but with limitation in terms of coverage area and lightning magnitude (kA). With this paper presented, it is expected to complement this novel technology literature with its proof of function, field site installation precautions and as-found system limitations.","PeriodicalId":153269,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, March 02, 2023","volume":"127 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, March 02, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22896-ea","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to share on the application and performance monitoring of Compound Air Plasma Lightning Rejection (CPLR) system at an onshore terminal facility. Malaysia is one of the top three countries in the world with high lightning density, recorded average of 13.9 flashes per square kilometer annually. Thus, the country's oil and gas industry is indeed vulnerable to the dangerous impact of lightning, often associated with risk like fire, explosion, and release of hazardous material. During the initial stage of lightning development, the air acts as an insulator between positive and negative charges at the cloud and ground. However, when the difference between charges is too great, the insulating capacity of the air breaks down, caused rapid discharge of electricity and resulting in a lightning formation. Upon detection of potential difference between storm cloud and ground, CPLR will release plasma ion, that in theory will neutralize the positive and negative ions and eventually prevent lightning to happen. This paper will discuss on the investigation outcome of two vent fire incidents at the produced water tanks of an oil and gas receiving facility at east coast of Malaysia, in relation with the functionality of this novel active lightning protection system. Detailed comparison has been made between CPLR lightning rejection data and the data from an electricity utility research company (TNB-Research) lightning mapping to study the system's reliability and effectiveness. During the first vent fire incident in 2018, data analysis showed that there was no lightning strike within the CPLR coverage area and suspected the lightning propagated from the nearest striking point in lightning mapping following the path of least resistance. In addition, this also surfaced up several installation issues such as insufficient protection coverage due to incorrect pole height design, communication card failure etc. Identified action items have been implemented to restore the CPLR system for tank lightning protection. After that, the system has been closely monitored for its performance and it showed reliable lightning rejection data in year 2020 with no vent fire occurence. However, the second vent fire incident happened in 2021. Post investigation, TNB-R data showed that the lightning stroke 200m from the produced water tank recorded peak current value at −68kA which was two times higher than the average lightning amperage. This concluded that CPLR was unable to reject propagated lightning of high magnitude as well. In overall, CPLR system is proved to be functioning but with limitation in terms of coverage area and lightning magnitude (kA). With this paper presented, it is expected to complement this novel technology literature with its proof of function, field site installation precautions and as-found system limitations.
复合空气等离子体防雷系统的应用及性能监测
本文的目的是分享复合空气等离子体防雷(CPLR)系统在陆上终端设施中的应用和性能监测。马来西亚是世界上闪电密度最高的三个国家之一,每年平均每平方公里有13.9次闪电。因此,该国的石油和天然气行业确实容易受到闪电的危险影响,通常与火灾、爆炸和有害物质释放等风险有关。在闪电发展的初始阶段,空气在云层和地面的正电荷和负电荷之间起绝缘体的作用。然而,当电荷之间的差异太大时,空气的绝缘能力就会崩溃,引起电力的快速放电,导致闪电的形成。CPLR在检测到雷雨云与地面的电位差后,释放等离子体离子,理论上可以中和正离子和负离子,最终防止闪电发生。本文将讨论在马来西亚东海岸的一个石油和天然气接收设施的生产水箱中发生的两起排气火灾事件的调查结果,与这种新型主动防雷系统的功能有关。将CPLR防雷数据与一家电力研究公司(TNB-Research)的雷电测绘数据进行了详细的比较,以研究系统的可靠性和有效性。在2018年第一次喷口火灾事件中,数据分析显示CPLR覆盖区域内没有雷击,怀疑闪电从闪电测绘中最近的雷击点沿阻力最小的路径传播。此外,这也暴露了一些安装问题,如由于不正确的杆高设计导致的保护覆盖不足,通信卡故障等。确定的行动项目已经实施,以恢复CPLR系统的坦克防雷保护。此后,该系统的性能得到了密切监测,并在2020年显示了可靠的防雷击数据,没有发生通风口火灾。然而,第二次喷口火灾事件发生在2021年。经调查,TNB-R数据显示,距采出水箱200m的雷击记录的峰值电流为- 68kA,比平均雷击安培高2倍。由此得出的结论是CPLR也不能拒绝高量级的传播闪电。总体而言,CPLR系统被证明是有效的,但在覆盖面积和雷电量级(kA)方面存在局限性。随着本文的提出,期望通过其功能证明,现场安装注意事项和已发现的系统限制来补充这种新技术文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信