The Southern Syncopated Orchestra

Howard Rye
{"title":"The Southern Syncopated Orchestra","authors":"Howard Rye","doi":"10.1093/acref/9780195301731.013.47655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Southern Syncopated Orchestra has exercised an enduring fascination for European enthusiasts and researchers, and understandably so. It brought to Europe the first of the New Orleans \"jazz greats\" to cross the Atlantic and provoked some of the earliest serious public commentary on jazz outside the pages of the African-American press. Furthermore, it was the ultimate jazz nursery. Many of the non-American members of the African diaspora who were to play jazz in Europe during the first jazz age, and some of their white contemporaries, learned their trade in its ever-changing ranks. This very large musical aggregation, which was said to have a repertoire of about five hundred songs (\"Kings Bench Division\" 1920), played a mixture of jazz, ragtime, spirituals, minstrelsy, light classical music, and anything else which could be given a credible African-American cast in a climate which at first sight was one of almost total public ignorance. In reality, it is not quite that simple. It is not an accident that the original prime mover of the Southern Syncopated Orchestra (SSO), Will Marion Cook, had also been involved with the high profile London presentation of In Dahomey back in 1903 (Green 1983; Parsonage 2005, 81-104). This also was only one incident, though a very important one, in a long line of presentations of music with a distinctively African-American content extending back into the nineteenth century. The evolution from \"minstrelsy\" to \"ragtime\" to \"jazz\" was all traceable in the comings and goings of performers on the music-hall circuits throughout Europe (Pickering 1990; Lotz 1997a). Catherine Parsonage (2005) has recently written at length on the context and significance of the Southern Syncopated Orchestra, making brilliant use, with full acknowledgment, of many of the facts presented in the original version of this study. It would be quite difficult to improve on her interpretation. The important point is to set aside notions of jazz development drawn from the dream picture developed by the young jazz enthusiasts of the 1930s. This views African-American music as a simple line of development in which an apparently spontaneous musical development in New Orleans spread up the river to Chicago and then to New York City, from where it conquered the world. In practice this line of development is often viewed through the forms resulting from co-option by mainstream culture, though this is rarely acknowledged. Though this model has been formally rejected by serious scholars for decades, much current writing about jazz still accepts its implications and the concomitant notion of artistic progress in which each stage is of greater artistic value than its predecessor, which must henceforth be dismissed as a technically inferior and an old-fashioned embarrassment. This view of the history and significance of each stage of development flies in the face of everything we know about the rest of human artistic endeavor. Parsonage's analysis of contemporary perceptions of the differences between jazz and the types of African-American music which had preceded it in the European market place is required reading for understanding the SSO's significance. The American background also has been in the last decade the subject of three major studies by Lynn Abbott, Tim Brooks, and Doug Seroff which are also important sources (Abbott and Seroff 2002, 2007; Brooks 2004). The crucial point for the immediate purpose is that music of distinctively African-American character in both style and performance practices had been present on the London scene for decades, and that during the Great War African-American string-band music had become the music of choice of London's movers and shakers. In London's upper-class clubs, complete African-American bands such as the Versatile Four (Berresford, Rye, and Walker, 2995) and Dan Kildare's Clef Club Orchestra (Rye and Brooks 2997) wowed listeners and dancers alike in between playing numerous private parties for well-heeled Londoners desirous of forgetting the war. …","PeriodicalId":354930,"journal":{"name":"Black Music Research Journal","volume":" 36","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Black Music Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780195301731.013.47655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The Southern Syncopated Orchestra has exercised an enduring fascination for European enthusiasts and researchers, and understandably so. It brought to Europe the first of the New Orleans "jazz greats" to cross the Atlantic and provoked some of the earliest serious public commentary on jazz outside the pages of the African-American press. Furthermore, it was the ultimate jazz nursery. Many of the non-American members of the African diaspora who were to play jazz in Europe during the first jazz age, and some of their white contemporaries, learned their trade in its ever-changing ranks. This very large musical aggregation, which was said to have a repertoire of about five hundred songs ("Kings Bench Division" 1920), played a mixture of jazz, ragtime, spirituals, minstrelsy, light classical music, and anything else which could be given a credible African-American cast in a climate which at first sight was one of almost total public ignorance. In reality, it is not quite that simple. It is not an accident that the original prime mover of the Southern Syncopated Orchestra (SSO), Will Marion Cook, had also been involved with the high profile London presentation of In Dahomey back in 1903 (Green 1983; Parsonage 2005, 81-104). This also was only one incident, though a very important one, in a long line of presentations of music with a distinctively African-American content extending back into the nineteenth century. The evolution from "minstrelsy" to "ragtime" to "jazz" was all traceable in the comings and goings of performers on the music-hall circuits throughout Europe (Pickering 1990; Lotz 1997a). Catherine Parsonage (2005) has recently written at length on the context and significance of the Southern Syncopated Orchestra, making brilliant use, with full acknowledgment, of many of the facts presented in the original version of this study. It would be quite difficult to improve on her interpretation. The important point is to set aside notions of jazz development drawn from the dream picture developed by the young jazz enthusiasts of the 1930s. This views African-American music as a simple line of development in which an apparently spontaneous musical development in New Orleans spread up the river to Chicago and then to New York City, from where it conquered the world. In practice this line of development is often viewed through the forms resulting from co-option by mainstream culture, though this is rarely acknowledged. Though this model has been formally rejected by serious scholars for decades, much current writing about jazz still accepts its implications and the concomitant notion of artistic progress in which each stage is of greater artistic value than its predecessor, which must henceforth be dismissed as a technically inferior and an old-fashioned embarrassment. This view of the history and significance of each stage of development flies in the face of everything we know about the rest of human artistic endeavor. Parsonage's analysis of contemporary perceptions of the differences between jazz and the types of African-American music which had preceded it in the European market place is required reading for understanding the SSO's significance. The American background also has been in the last decade the subject of three major studies by Lynn Abbott, Tim Brooks, and Doug Seroff which are also important sources (Abbott and Seroff 2002, 2007; Brooks 2004). The crucial point for the immediate purpose is that music of distinctively African-American character in both style and performance practices had been present on the London scene for decades, and that during the Great War African-American string-band music had become the music of choice of London's movers and shakers. In London's upper-class clubs, complete African-American bands such as the Versatile Four (Berresford, Rye, and Walker, 2995) and Dan Kildare's Clef Club Orchestra (Rye and Brooks 2997) wowed listeners and dancers alike in between playing numerous private parties for well-heeled Londoners desirous of forgetting the war. …
南方切分音管弦乐团
南方切分音乐团对欧洲的爱好者和研究人员有着持久的吸引力,这是可以理解的。它把新奥尔良的第一个“爵士大师”带到了欧洲,跨越了大西洋,并在非裔美国人的报纸之外引发了对爵士乐最早的一些严肃的公开评论。此外,这是一个终极的爵士托儿所。在第一个爵士乐时代,许多散居在欧洲的非美国非洲人演奏爵士乐,以及他们同时代的一些白人,在不断变化的队伍中学会了他们的手艺。这个非常庞大的音乐组合,据说有大约500首歌曲的保留曲目(“国王长凳师”1920),演奏爵士乐,拉格泰姆,灵歌,吟唱,轻古典音乐,以及其他任何可以给一个可信的非裔美国人演员的音乐,乍一看几乎是完全无知的公众。实际上,事情并没有那么简单。南方切分管弦乐团(SSO)最初的主要推动者威尔·马里恩·库克(Will Marion Cook)也参与了1903年在伦敦举行的高知名度的《In Dahomey》演出,这并非偶然(Green 1983;牧师住宅2005,81 -104)。这也只是一个事件,虽然是一个非常重要的事件,在一长串的音乐呈现中有明显的非裔美国人的内容可以追溯到19世纪。从“吟游诗人”到“拉格泰姆”再到“爵士”的演变都可以追溯到表演者在欧洲各地音乐厅巡回演出的进进出出(Pickering 1990;Lotz 1997)。Catherine Parsonage(2005)最近写了一篇关于南方切分管弦乐团的背景和意义的长篇文章,充分利用了本研究原始版本中提出的许多事实。要提高她的口译水平是相当困难的。重要的一点是,抛开从20世纪30年代年轻爵士乐爱好者的梦想画面中得出的爵士乐发展概念。这种观点认为,非洲裔美国人的音乐是一条简单的发展路线,在新奥尔良,一种明显自发的音乐发展沿着河流传播到芝加哥,然后到纽约市,从那里它征服了世界。在实践中,这一发展路线通常通过主流文化的合作形式来看待,尽管这一点很少得到承认。尽管这种模式已经被严肃的学者们正式拒绝了几十年,但目前许多关于爵士乐的文章仍然接受它的含义,以及随之而来的艺术进步的概念,即每一个阶段都比前一个阶段具有更大的艺术价值,因此必须将其视为技术上的低劣和过时的尴尬而予以摒弃。这种对每个发展阶段的历史和意义的看法,与我们所知道的人类其余艺术努力的一切都是背道而驰的。为了理解SSO的重要性,Parsonage对爵士乐和非裔美国人音乐之间的差异的当代看法的分析是必要的。在过去十年中,美国背景也一直是Lynn Abbott, Tim Brooks和Doug Seroff的三项主要研究的主题,这些研究也是重要的来源(Abbott和Seroff 2002, 2007;布鲁克斯2004年)。直接目的的关键一点是,在风格和表演实践上具有独特的非裔美国人特征的音乐已经在伦敦现场出现了几十年,在第一次世界大战期间,非裔美国人的弦乐队音乐已经成为伦敦大人物们的音乐选择。在伦敦的上流社会俱乐部里,完整的非裔美国人乐队,如百能四人组(Berresford, Rye, and Walker, 2995)和丹·基尔代尔的谱号俱乐部管弦乐队(Rye and Brooks, 2997),在为那些渴望忘记战争的富有的伦敦人举办的众多私人聚会上演奏,让听众和舞者都为之惊叹。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信