Thinking Fast: Patterns of Cognitive Error in Software Engineering Education and Practice

R. Gallant
{"title":"Thinking Fast: Patterns of Cognitive Error in Software Engineering Education and Practice","authors":"R. Gallant","doi":"10.1109/SWSTE.2016.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author utilizes typical mistakes of third year undergraduate Computer Science and Software Engineering students in advanced software engineering courses to categorize and anticipates errors in engineering practice. In elementary courses, the students learn and apply techniques locally to relatively simple problems. In advanced courses the students are trained to select and integrate a number of techniques to solve several interdependent problems encountered in the development of complex systems. In this context, the work of Daniel Kahneman on System 1 (intuitive) and System 2 (rational) thinking is quite relevant to analysis of the patterns leading to cognitive errors. Implications for engineering practice are explored.","PeriodicalId":118525,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Science, Technology and Engineering (SWSTE)","volume":"263 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Science, Technology and Engineering (SWSTE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SWSTE.2016.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, the author utilizes typical mistakes of third year undergraduate Computer Science and Software Engineering students in advanced software engineering courses to categorize and anticipates errors in engineering practice. In elementary courses, the students learn and apply techniques locally to relatively simple problems. In advanced courses the students are trained to select and integrate a number of techniques to solve several interdependent problems encountered in the development of complex systems. In this context, the work of Daniel Kahneman on System 1 (intuitive) and System 2 (rational) thinking is quite relevant to analysis of the patterns leading to cognitive errors. Implications for engineering practice are explored.
快速思考:软件工程教育与实践中的认知错误模式
本文利用计算机科学与软件工程本科三年级学生在高级软件工程课程中的典型错误,对工程实践中的错误进行分类和预测。在初级课程中,学生学习并将技术应用于相对简单的问题。在高级课程中,学生被训练选择和整合一些技术来解决复杂系统开发中遇到的几个相互依存的问题。在这种背景下,Daniel Kahneman关于系统1(直觉)和系统2(理性)思维的工作与分析导致认知错误的模式非常相关。对工程实践的启示进行了探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信