Use of regularized discriminant analysis improves myoelectric hand movement classification

Agamemnon Krasoulis, K. Nazarpour, S. Vijayakumar
{"title":"Use of regularized discriminant analysis improves myoelectric hand movement classification","authors":"Agamemnon Krasoulis, K. Nazarpour, S. Vijayakumar","doi":"10.1109/NER.2017.8008373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is the most commonly used classification method for movement intention decoding from myoelectric signals. In this work, we review the performance of various discriminant analysis variants on the task of hand motion classification. We demonstrate that optimal classification performance is achieved with regularized discriminant analysis (RDA), a method which generalizes various class-conditional Gaussian classifiers, including LDA, quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), and Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB). The RDA method offers a continuum between these models via tuning two hyper-parameters which control the amount of regularization applied to the estimated covariance matrices. In this study, we performed a systematic classification performance comparison on four datasets. Hand motion was decoded from myoelectric and inertial data recorded from 60 able-bodied and 12 amputee subjects whilst they performed a range of 40 movements. We found that when the regularization parameters of the RDA classifier were carefully tuned via cross-validation, classification accuracy was statistically higher by a large margin as compared to any other discriminant analysis method (average improvement of 13.7% over LDA). Importantly, our findings were consistent across the able-bodied and amputee populations. This observation provides supporting evidence that our proposed methodology could improve the performance of pattern recognition-based myoelectric prostheses.","PeriodicalId":142883,"journal":{"name":"2017 8th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","volume":"195 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 8th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NER.2017.8008373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is the most commonly used classification method for movement intention decoding from myoelectric signals. In this work, we review the performance of various discriminant analysis variants on the task of hand motion classification. We demonstrate that optimal classification performance is achieved with regularized discriminant analysis (RDA), a method which generalizes various class-conditional Gaussian classifiers, including LDA, quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), and Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB). The RDA method offers a continuum between these models via tuning two hyper-parameters which control the amount of regularization applied to the estimated covariance matrices. In this study, we performed a systematic classification performance comparison on four datasets. Hand motion was decoded from myoelectric and inertial data recorded from 60 able-bodied and 12 amputee subjects whilst they performed a range of 40 movements. We found that when the regularization parameters of the RDA classifier were carefully tuned via cross-validation, classification accuracy was statistically higher by a large margin as compared to any other discriminant analysis method (average improvement of 13.7% over LDA). Importantly, our findings were consistent across the able-bodied and amputee populations. This observation provides supporting evidence that our proposed methodology could improve the performance of pattern recognition-based myoelectric prostheses.
使用正则化判别分析改进了手肌电运动分类
线性判别分析(LDA)是肌电信号中最常用的动作意图分类方法。在这项工作中,我们回顾了各种判别分析变体在手部运动分类任务中的表现。我们证明了正则化判别分析(RDA)可以获得最佳的分类性能,RDA是一种推广各种类别条件高斯分类器的方法,包括LDA,二次判别分析(QDA)和高斯朴素贝叶斯(GNB)。RDA方法通过调整两个控制应用于估计协方差矩阵的正则化量的超参数,在这些模型之间提供了一个连续体。在本研究中,我们对四个数据集进行了系统的分类性能比较。研究人员从60名健全人和12名截肢者进行40种运动时记录的肌电和惯性数据中解码手部运动。我们发现,当通过交叉验证仔细调整RDA分类器的正则化参数时,与任何其他判别分析方法相比,分类精度在统计上有很大的提高(比LDA平均提高13.7%)。重要的是,我们的发现在健全和截肢人群中是一致的。这一观察结果提供了支持证据,表明我们提出的方法可以提高基于模式识别的肌电假体的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信