Postcolonial Reading of the Bible: (Evangelical) Friend or Foe?

Ferry Y. Mamahit
{"title":"Postcolonial Reading of the Bible: (Evangelical) Friend or Foe?","authors":"Ferry Y. Mamahit","doi":"10.25278/jj.v19i2.563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading the Bible through a postcolonial lens has become today’s trend in biblical hermeneutics. It triggers pros and cons within the evangelical circle. Is it friend or foe? Rather than uncritically accepting or refusing it, the article chooses a middle way, being “open but cautious” toward it. The article assumes that every reading method has its strengths and weaknesses and, thus, it can offer valuable things. Applying the content analysis theory, the author finds that a postcolonial biblical reading is somehow relevant to a contextual and transformative biblical reading, regardless of its multiple problems. It enables the readers to be self-critical, context-sensitive, and practical in faith-life integration. The article concludes that postcolonial reading of the Bible can be both (evangelical) friend and foe.","PeriodicalId":186227,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Jaffray","volume":"328 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Jaffray","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25278/jj.v19i2.563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading the Bible through a postcolonial lens has become today’s trend in biblical hermeneutics. It triggers pros and cons within the evangelical circle. Is it friend or foe? Rather than uncritically accepting or refusing it, the article chooses a middle way, being “open but cautious” toward it. The article assumes that every reading method has its strengths and weaknesses and, thus, it can offer valuable things. Applying the content analysis theory, the author finds that a postcolonial biblical reading is somehow relevant to a contextual and transformative biblical reading, regardless of its multiple problems. It enables the readers to be self-critical, context-sensitive, and practical in faith-life integration. The article concludes that postcolonial reading of the Bible can be both (evangelical) friend and foe.
后殖民时代对圣经的解读:(福音派)是敌是友?
通过后殖民视角解读圣经已经成为当今圣经解释学的趋势。这在福音派圈子里引发了赞成和反对。它是朋友还是敌人?文章没有不加批判地接受或拒绝,而是选择了一条“开放但谨慎”的中间道路。本文认为每一种阅读方法都有其优点和缺点,因此,它可以提供有价值的东西。运用内容分析理论,作者发现后殖民时代的圣经阅读与语境性的、变革性的圣经阅读在某种程度上是相关的,尽管存在多重问题。它使读者能够自我批评,对环境敏感,并在信仰与生活的融合中实践。这篇文章的结论是,后殖民时代的圣经阅读既可以是福音派的朋友,也可以是敌人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信