Triggered vacuum switch and air spark gap for pulsed power applications

X. Duan, M. Liao, J. Zou, Chun Zhao
{"title":"Triggered vacuum switch and air spark gap for pulsed power applications","authors":"X. Duan, M. Liao, J. Zou, Chun Zhao","doi":"10.1109/PPC.2011.6191635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The closing switch is the main device to control the power supply of an ElectroMagnetic Launcher (EML) system. Three types of closing switch which included a triggered vacuum switch (TVS) and two air spark gaps (ASGs) named ASG-1, ASG-2 and ASG-3 with different configuration in trigger unit were described for investigating the delay characteristics, high current capacity and erosion characteristics. A LC resonant circuit was set up and connected with the TVS's and ASG's main electrodes. A design circuit for controlling the TVS and ASGs was proposed. The trigger energy of the controller can be adjusted conveniently. By means of changing the trigger energy, the experimental data show that the delay time and jitter time decrease with increasing the trigger energy. The delay time and jitter time decreases magnificently with increasing the voltage in main gap. The improvement in the structure and controller of the TVS and ASG is a good way of decreasing the delay time and jitter time. It shows that TVS-2 has better performance in delay time and jitter time than TVS-1. Generally, ARG-2 and ARG-3 have shorter delay time than TVS-1 and TVS-2, as the initial plasma would be generated much more easily and quickly in the air than that in the vacuum case. ASG has a shorter delay time and lower needed minimum breakdown voltage than TVS. The results show that TVS is a better choice than ARG with insignificant erosion.","PeriodicalId":331835,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE Pulsed Power Conference","volume":"60 1-2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE Pulsed Power Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PPC.2011.6191635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The closing switch is the main device to control the power supply of an ElectroMagnetic Launcher (EML) system. Three types of closing switch which included a triggered vacuum switch (TVS) and two air spark gaps (ASGs) named ASG-1, ASG-2 and ASG-3 with different configuration in trigger unit were described for investigating the delay characteristics, high current capacity and erosion characteristics. A LC resonant circuit was set up and connected with the TVS's and ASG's main electrodes. A design circuit for controlling the TVS and ASGs was proposed. The trigger energy of the controller can be adjusted conveniently. By means of changing the trigger energy, the experimental data show that the delay time and jitter time decrease with increasing the trigger energy. The delay time and jitter time decreases magnificently with increasing the voltage in main gap. The improvement in the structure and controller of the TVS and ASG is a good way of decreasing the delay time and jitter time. It shows that TVS-2 has better performance in delay time and jitter time than TVS-1. Generally, ARG-2 and ARG-3 have shorter delay time than TVS-1 and TVS-2, as the initial plasma would be generated much more easily and quickly in the air than that in the vacuum case. ASG has a shorter delay time and lower needed minimum breakdown voltage than TVS. The results show that TVS is a better choice than ARG with insignificant erosion.
脉冲功率应用的触发真空开关和空气火花间隙
合闸开关是控制电磁发射器(EML)系统电源的主要装置。本文介绍了触发真空开关(TVS)和空气火花隙(ASG-1、ASG-2和ASG-3)三种类型的闭合开关,它们在触发单元中具有不同的配置,以研究延迟特性、大电流容量和侵蚀特性。建立了LC谐振电路,并与TVS和ASG的主电极连接。提出了一种控制TVS和ASGs的设计电路。控制器的触发能量可以方便地调节。通过改变触发能量,实验数据表明,随着触发能量的增加,延迟时间和抖动时间减小。随着主隙电压的增大,延迟时间和抖动时间明显减小。对TVS和ASG的结构和控制器进行改进是减小时延和抖动时间的好方法。结果表明,TVS-2在延迟时间和抖动时间方面都优于TVS-1。一般来说,ARG-2和ARG-3的延迟时间比TVS-1和TVS-2短,因为初始等离子体在空气中比在真空情况下更容易和更快地产生。与TVS相比,ASG具有更短的延迟时间和更低的所需最小击穿电压。结果表明,TVS是比ARG更好的选择,且侵蚀较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信