Lessons from the ILC’s Work on ‘Immunity of State Officials’: Melland Schill Lecture, 21 November 2017

M. Wood
{"title":"Lessons from the ILC’s Work on ‘Immunity of State Officials’: Melland Schill Lecture, 21 November 2017","authors":"M. Wood","doi":"10.1163/18757413_022001003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic Immunity of State officials from foreign criminal jurisdiction has been on the programme of work of the International Law Commission since 2007. After ten reports from two Special Rapporteurs, by June 2019 it has yet to complete a first reading, not least because the topic has proved highly contentious both within the Commission and among States. The Commission could only adopt a central provision (on exceptions to immunity ratione materiae), exceptionally, having recourse to voting. There are several lessons to be learnt from the handling of the topic over the last twelve years, including for such crucial aspects of the Commission’s working methods as the choice of topics; the need for a clear view of the Commission’s aim in taking up a topic; the need for rigour in assessing the current state of international law; the importance of dialogue, within the Commission and between the Commission and States; and the utility or otherwise of voting.","PeriodicalId":167092,"journal":{"name":"Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online","volume":"51 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18757413_022001003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The topic Immunity of State officials from foreign criminal jurisdiction has been on the programme of work of the International Law Commission since 2007. After ten reports from two Special Rapporteurs, by June 2019 it has yet to complete a first reading, not least because the topic has proved highly contentious both within the Commission and among States. The Commission could only adopt a central provision (on exceptions to immunity ratione materiae), exceptionally, having recourse to voting. There are several lessons to be learnt from the handling of the topic over the last twelve years, including for such crucial aspects of the Commission’s working methods as the choice of topics; the need for a clear view of the Commission’s aim in taking up a topic; the need for rigour in assessing the current state of international law; the importance of dialogue, within the Commission and between the Commission and States; and the utility or otherwise of voting.
国际法委员会“国家官员豁免”工作的经验教训:Melland Schill讲座,2017年11月21日
自2007年以来,国家官员的外国刑事管辖豁免专题一直列入国际法委员会的工作方案。在两位特别报告员提交了十份报告之后,截至2019年6月,该专题尚未完成一读,尤其是因为该专题在委员会内部和各国之间都极具争议。委员会只能例外地通过一项中心条款(关于属事豁免的例外情况),并诉诸表决。可以从过去十二年来处理这个专题的工作中吸取若干教训,包括委员会工作方法的关键方面,如专题的选择;需要清楚地了解委员会讨论某一专题的目的;必须严格评估国际法的现状;委员会内部和委员会与各国之间对话的重要性;以及投票的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信