Assessing Radicalization and Deradicalization

A. Kruglanski, J. Bélanger, R. Gunaratna
{"title":"Assessing Radicalization and Deradicalization","authors":"A. Kruglanski, J. Bélanger, R. Gunaratna","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190851125.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter presents a new evaluation tool for determining the degree of success of deradicalization programs. This battery consists of elements that represent the 3N pillars: It contains tools for assessing individuals’ quest for significance, their adherence to an ideological narrative that supports violence, and their membership in social networks that adhere to those narratives. The proposed tool consists of a triangulation of two methodologies, each with its own advantages and disadvantages that collectively compensate for each other. One methodology consists of a self-report measure in form of a survey that target individuals (suspected or at risk of radicalization) fill out. The second methodology consists of an observational system focused on the same 3N elements and carried out by persons in close contact with those target individuals.","PeriodicalId":157685,"journal":{"name":"The Three Pillars of Radicalization","volume":"37 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Three Pillars of Radicalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190851125.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter presents a new evaluation tool for determining the degree of success of deradicalization programs. This battery consists of elements that represent the 3N pillars: It contains tools for assessing individuals’ quest for significance, their adherence to an ideological narrative that supports violence, and their membership in social networks that adhere to those narratives. The proposed tool consists of a triangulation of two methodologies, each with its own advantages and disadvantages that collectively compensate for each other. One methodology consists of a self-report measure in form of a survey that target individuals (suspected or at risk of radicalization) fill out. The second methodology consists of an observational system focused on the same 3N elements and carried out by persons in close contact with those target individuals.
评估激进化和去激进化
本章提出了一种新的评估工具,用于确定去极端化计划的成功程度。这个电池由代表3N个支柱的元素组成:它包含评估个人对重要性的追求的工具,他们对支持暴力的意识形态叙事的坚持,以及他们在坚持这些叙事的社交网络中的成员资格。建议的工具由两种方法的三角测量组成,每种方法都有自己的优点和缺点,这些优点和缺点相互弥补。一种方法是以调查的形式进行自我报告,目标是个人(被怀疑或有激进化风险的人)填写。第二种方法包括一个以同样的3N要素为重点的观察系统,由与这些目标个体密切接触的人员执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信