A Diachronic Hypothesis about Imperfective unnu in Malayalam

Gouthaman K.J
{"title":"A Diachronic Hypothesis about Imperfective unnu in Malayalam","authors":"Gouthaman K.J","doi":"10.54392/ijll2241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Across languages, the imperfective is associated with three distinct readings-“event in progress”, “habitual or generic” and “continuous” with stative predicates. In Malayalam, the suffix unnu had been identified as the imperfective suffix in linguistic literature. However, it has been noted in subsequent studies that the “generic or habitual” reading with unnu is distinctly different from a typical generic reading and that such ‘typical generic’ readings are obtained by the modal um in Malayalam. This has also led to the claim that unnu is not an imperfective marker, but an iterative pluractional bundled with progressive aspect. This paper attempts to deal with this puzzle differently, arguing that unnu is a progressive marker in the process of becoming an imperfective in Malayalam. A description of the properties of unnu-sentences, contrasting them with sentences that use the progressive marker uka and sentences that use the modal/generic marker um, is attempted. The paper also explores the role of uND(ə), the existential copula, in obtaining habitual and episodic readings with unnu. This alternative account for unnu is shown to be supported by opinions of traditional grammarians in history as well as theories of grammaticalization in diachronic semantics. It is also hypothesized that this process is blocked or halted in Malayalam by a suffix devoted to generic constructions and previously unexplored in the literature.","PeriodicalId":217297,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Language and Linguistics","volume":"32 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Language and Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54392/ijll2241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Across languages, the imperfective is associated with three distinct readings-“event in progress”, “habitual or generic” and “continuous” with stative predicates. In Malayalam, the suffix unnu had been identified as the imperfective suffix in linguistic literature. However, it has been noted in subsequent studies that the “generic or habitual” reading with unnu is distinctly different from a typical generic reading and that such ‘typical generic’ readings are obtained by the modal um in Malayalam. This has also led to the claim that unnu is not an imperfective marker, but an iterative pluractional bundled with progressive aspect. This paper attempts to deal with this puzzle differently, arguing that unnu is a progressive marker in the process of becoming an imperfective in Malayalam. A description of the properties of unnu-sentences, contrasting them with sentences that use the progressive marker uka and sentences that use the modal/generic marker um, is attempted. The paper also explores the role of uND(ə), the existential copula, in obtaining habitual and episodic readings with unnu. This alternative account for unnu is shown to be supported by opinions of traditional grammarians in history as well as theories of grammaticalization in diachronic semantics. It is also hypothesized that this process is blocked or halted in Malayalam by a suffix devoted to generic constructions and previously unexplored in the literature.
马拉雅拉姆语不完全unnu的历时性假设
在各种语言中,不完成时与三种不同的解读有关——“正在进行的事件”、“习惯性或一般的”和带有静态谓语的“持续的”。在马拉雅拉姆语中,后缀unnu在语言学文献中被认为是不完全后缀。然而,在随后的研究中,人们注意到unnu的“一般或习惯性”阅读与典型的一般阅读明显不同,这种“典型的一般”阅读是由马拉雅拉姆语的模态um获得的。这也导致声称unnu不是一个不完善的标记,而是一个迭代的多元行为捆绑与进步方面。本文试图以不同的方式来解决这个难题,认为unnu是马拉雅拉姆语中成为不完善词的过程中的一个进步标记。本文试图描述unnu句的属性,并将它们与使用进行式标记uka的句子和使用情态/一般标记um的句子进行对比。本文还探讨了uND(æ)这一存在连词在用unnu获得习惯性和情景性阅读中的作用。历史上传统语法学家的观点以及历时语义学的语法化理论都支持这种对unnu的解释。还有一种假设是,这一过程在马拉雅拉姆语中被一个专门用于一般结构的后缀所阻碍或停止,而这一后缀在文献中从未被探索过。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信