Current State and Future Improvement of the Elderly Participation in Clinical Trials

Sun Kim, Hee-Won Jung, Miran Park, J. Chung, Keun-Wook Lee, J. Kim, J. Lee, Kwang-il Kim, C. Kim
{"title":"Current State and Future Improvement of the Elderly Participation in Clinical Trials","authors":"Sun Kim, Hee-Won Jung, Miran Park, J. Chung, Keun-Wook Lee, J. Kim, J. Lee, Kwang-il Kim, C. Kim","doi":"10.4235/JKGS.2014.18.3.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical trials are widely used to approve the efficacy and discover adverse reactions of new drugs. However, there has been much concern about the unjustified exclusion of the older adults in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to assess ageism in clinical trials and to find solution to any discovered discrimination. Methods: An online questionnaire was completed by 1,650 experts including doctors, pharmaceutical staff, and contract research organization members. An offline inquiry was conducted by 250 experienced professors from a single tertiary hospital and other allied professions. The questions covered the current state of elderly participation, possible reasons for under-representation, and plans for its solution. Results: Among 1,900 subjects, 246 (12.9%) individuals completed the survey. We excluded the six subjects who did not answer more than 10 questions, and analyzed the remaining 240 respondents. They agreed that there are tendencies to exclude the aged from clinical trials (69.2%), and that under-representation would cause difficulties for doctors and geriatric patients. Most people (84.6%) thought that treating older adults with the results from trials which exclude aged participants is inappropriate. Because respondents had difficulties explaining the trial process and obtaining informed consent, they thought establishing a geriatric clinical trial team would be highly effective. Experts also believed that financial inducements and legal regulations are required to increase elderly enrollment. Conclusion: Because the elderly have a unique physiology, the participation of older adults in clinical research is indispensable for verifying efficacy and determining potential adverse reactions. Consequently, clinical research professionals should be concerned about the participation of older subjects, and the authorities must begin to care about age discrimination in research fields.","PeriodicalId":191447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Korean Geriatrics Society","volume":"3 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Korean Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/JKGS.2014.18.3.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials are widely used to approve the efficacy and discover adverse reactions of new drugs. However, there has been much concern about the unjustified exclusion of the older adults in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to assess ageism in clinical trials and to find solution to any discovered discrimination. Methods: An online questionnaire was completed by 1,650 experts including doctors, pharmaceutical staff, and contract research organization members. An offline inquiry was conducted by 250 experienced professors from a single tertiary hospital and other allied professions. The questions covered the current state of elderly participation, possible reasons for under-representation, and plans for its solution. Results: Among 1,900 subjects, 246 (12.9%) individuals completed the survey. We excluded the six subjects who did not answer more than 10 questions, and analyzed the remaining 240 respondents. They agreed that there are tendencies to exclude the aged from clinical trials (69.2%), and that under-representation would cause difficulties for doctors and geriatric patients. Most people (84.6%) thought that treating older adults with the results from trials which exclude aged participants is inappropriate. Because respondents had difficulties explaining the trial process and obtaining informed consent, they thought establishing a geriatric clinical trial team would be highly effective. Experts also believed that financial inducements and legal regulations are required to increase elderly enrollment. Conclusion: Because the elderly have a unique physiology, the participation of older adults in clinical research is indispensable for verifying efficacy and determining potential adverse reactions. Consequently, clinical research professionals should be concerned about the participation of older subjects, and the authorities must begin to care about age discrimination in research fields.
老年人参与临床试验的现状与未来改进
背景:临床试验被广泛用于新药的疗效鉴定和不良反应发现。然而,在临床试验中不合理地排除老年人的做法引起了很多关注。本研究的目的是评估临床试验中的年龄歧视,并找到任何发现的歧视的解决方案。方法:对1650名医生、药学工作人员和合同研究机构成员进行在线问卷调查。来自一家三级医院和其他相关专业的250名经验丰富的教授进行了线下调查。这些问题包括老年人参与的现状、代表性不足的可能原因和解决方案。结果:1900名调查对象中,完成调查的有246人(12.9%)。我们排除了回答问题不超过10个的6名受试者,并对剩余的240名受访者进行了分析。他们一致认为,目前有将老年人排除在临床试验之外的趋势(69.2%),而且代表性不足会给医生和老年患者带来困难。大多数人(84.6%)认为用排除老年参与者的试验结果来治疗老年人是不合适的。由于受访者在解释试验过程和获得知情同意方面存在困难,他们认为建立一个老年临床试验团队将是非常有效的。专家们还认为,增加老年人入学率需要财政诱因和法律法规。结论:由于老年人具有独特的生理机能,老年人参与临床研究对于验证疗效和确定潜在不良反应是必不可少的。因此,临床研究专业人员应该关注老年受试者的参与,当局必须开始关注研究领域的年龄歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信