Digital Piracy Debunked: A Short Note on Digital Threats and Intermediary Liability

Giancarlo F. Frosio
{"title":"Digital Piracy Debunked: A Short Note on Digital Threats and Intermediary Liability","authors":"Giancarlo F. Frosio","doi":"10.14763/2016.1.400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last two decades, the industry has deployed endlessly the rhetoric of the “digital threat” in order to demand harsher measures against digital piracy. Recently, the “digital threat” discourse called for enhanced liability of online intermediaries, especially those whose platforms may be used to infringe copyright. This short paper shows that the “digital threat” discourse is based on shaky grounds. Two related arguments might run against this approach. First, market conditions might incentivise piracy. Additionally, there are raising doubts over the argument that piracy is a threat to creativity, especially in the digital environment. Overall, it may be hard to find a factual justification for policy decisions based on the “digital threat” discourse. In fact, digital technology seems not to have negatively affected the creation of new works. In contrast, an observation of the literature and quantitative analysis on point may suggest that digital piracy can be an opportunity for the cultural market. Finally, piracy may function as an innovation policy by forcing market players to innovate in response to a consumer demand that widespread piracy highlights.","PeriodicalId":142986,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14763/2016.1.400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

In the last two decades, the industry has deployed endlessly the rhetoric of the “digital threat” in order to demand harsher measures against digital piracy. Recently, the “digital threat” discourse called for enhanced liability of online intermediaries, especially those whose platforms may be used to infringe copyright. This short paper shows that the “digital threat” discourse is based on shaky grounds. Two related arguments might run against this approach. First, market conditions might incentivise piracy. Additionally, there are raising doubts over the argument that piracy is a threat to creativity, especially in the digital environment. Overall, it may be hard to find a factual justification for policy decisions based on the “digital threat” discourse. In fact, digital technology seems not to have negatively affected the creation of new works. In contrast, an observation of the literature and quantitative analysis on point may suggest that digital piracy can be an opportunity for the cultural market. Finally, piracy may function as an innovation policy by forcing market players to innovate in response to a consumer demand that widespread piracy highlights.
揭穿数字盗版:关于数字威胁和中介责任的简短说明
在过去的二十年里,为了要求对数字盗版采取更严厉的措施,该行业无休止地使用“数字威胁”的修辞。最近,关于“数字威胁”的讨论呼吁加强网络中介机构的责任,特别是那些其平台可能被用来侵犯版权的中介机构。这篇短文表明,“数字威胁”的论述是建立在不可靠的基础上的。有两个相关的论点可能会反对这种方法。首先,市场环境可能会刺激盗版行为。此外,有人质疑盗版是对创造力的威胁,特别是在数字环境中。总的来说,可能很难找到基于“数字威胁”话语的政策决定的事实依据。事实上,数字技术似乎并没有对新作品的创作产生负面影响。相比之下,对文献的观察和定量分析表明,数字盗版可能是文化市场的一个机会。最后,盗版可以作为一种创新政策,通过迫使市场参与者进行创新,以回应普遍存在的盗版所突出的消费者需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信