Examination of electric field distribution in a laboratory-built electrospinning device

R. A. Pózmán, L. Székely, R. Cselkó
{"title":"Examination of electric field distribution in a laboratory-built electrospinning device","authors":"R. A. Pózmán, L. Székely, R. Cselkó","doi":"10.1109/IYCE54153.2022.9857545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2019, Covid-19 pandemic appeared and affected the health of humanity. The virus can spread between people in various ways, but mostly from infected liquid particles. A fundamental method of defense is the use of a face mask in public, however, the efficiency of wearing a mask can be influenced by a number of factors. Most of the masks have a classification based on its filtration efficiency. There are three categories, the FFP1, FFP2 and FFP3, where FFP means „filtering facepiece”. All the 3 types can filter particles down to the size of 0.6 micrometer, but the FFP1's efficiency is 80%, the FFP2's 94%, while the FFP3's reaches 99%. In the USA they use the same categories, but call it KN80, KN95 and KN100. The problem is that the commonly used textile masks do not have a classification, which means that these cannot protect the wearer from being infected. The aim of our research is to improve the filter efficiency of masks, and we have described in this paper the first phase, the construction and testing of the laboratory model. Two cases were considered, with one needle and five needle solutions. During the experiments, the electrode distance was varied. When using more needles, the nanofibers covered a larger area, but there was a greater roughness between the fibers generated. Considering that electrospinning starts after a critical electric field strength, some calculations were performed in COMSOL model.","PeriodicalId":248738,"journal":{"name":"2022 8th International Youth Conference on Energy (IYCE)","volume":"2 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 8th International Youth Conference on Energy (IYCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IYCE54153.2022.9857545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 2019, Covid-19 pandemic appeared and affected the health of humanity. The virus can spread between people in various ways, but mostly from infected liquid particles. A fundamental method of defense is the use of a face mask in public, however, the efficiency of wearing a mask can be influenced by a number of factors. Most of the masks have a classification based on its filtration efficiency. There are three categories, the FFP1, FFP2 and FFP3, where FFP means „filtering facepiece”. All the 3 types can filter particles down to the size of 0.6 micrometer, but the FFP1's efficiency is 80%, the FFP2's 94%, while the FFP3's reaches 99%. In the USA they use the same categories, but call it KN80, KN95 and KN100. The problem is that the commonly used textile masks do not have a classification, which means that these cannot protect the wearer from being infected. The aim of our research is to improve the filter efficiency of masks, and we have described in this paper the first phase, the construction and testing of the laboratory model. Two cases were considered, with one needle and five needle solutions. During the experiments, the electrode distance was varied. When using more needles, the nanofibers covered a larger area, but there was a greater roughness between the fibers generated. Considering that electrospinning starts after a critical electric field strength, some calculations were performed in COMSOL model.
实验室自制静电纺丝装置中电场分布的检验
2019年,新冠肺炎大流行出现,影响了人类健康。这种病毒可以通过各种方式在人与人之间传播,但主要是通过受感染的液体颗粒传播。一个基本的防御方法是在公共场合使用口罩,然而,戴口罩的效率会受到许多因素的影响。大多数口罩都根据过滤效率进行分类。有三个类别,FFP1, FFP2和FFP3,其中FFP的意思是“过滤脸”。这三种类型的过滤器都可以过滤0.6微米大小的颗粒,但FFP1的效率为80%,FFP2为94%,而FFP3达到99%。在美国,他们使用相同的分类,但称之为KN80, KN95和KN100。问题是,常用的纺织品口罩没有分类,这意味着这些口罩不能保护佩戴者免受感染。我们的研究目的是为了提高口罩的过滤效率,我们在本文中描述了第一阶段,实验室模型的构建和测试。考虑两种情况,一针和五针解决方案。在实验过程中,电极的距离是不同的。当使用更多的针时,纳米纤维覆盖的面积更大,但产生的纤维之间的粗糙度更大。考虑到静电纺丝在达到临界电场强度后才开始,在COMSOL模型中进行了一些计算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信