A critical inquiry on the ideological and hegemonic practices in EFL textbooks

Ö. Ulum, D. Köksal
{"title":"A critical inquiry on the ideological and hegemonic practices in EFL textbooks","authors":"Ö. Ulum, D. Köksal","doi":"10.1515/mlt-2019-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The expanding hegemony of English caused English Language Teaching to suddenly turn into an international business with huge financial investment, and accordingly produced EFL textbooks evolved into a cornerstone of the business. Further, studies on the relation between ideology, hegemony, and textbooks have multiplied in recent decades as a result of the rise of critical theory, critical pedagogy, and critical thinking skills which have inspired scholars to establish a critical perspective towards EFL textbooks considering the compounds of ideology and hegemony. In this paper, using a mixed method research design, qualitatively collected data through interviews and quantitatively gathered data through a questionnaire aimed to reveal the views of teachers/instructors and learners about the ideological and hegemonic practices contained in the EFL textbooks. The results of questionnaire and interview showed that ideology and hegemony are closely related to each other. Moreover, it is hard to give a clear-cut definition of these two terms because both textbooks and participants often used these two terms interchangeably. However, the participants declared diverse views on the underlying ideology and hegemonic practices in globally and locally written EFL textbooks.","PeriodicalId":133504,"journal":{"name":"Multicultural Learning and Teaching","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multicultural Learning and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mlt-2019-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The expanding hegemony of English caused English Language Teaching to suddenly turn into an international business with huge financial investment, and accordingly produced EFL textbooks evolved into a cornerstone of the business. Further, studies on the relation between ideology, hegemony, and textbooks have multiplied in recent decades as a result of the rise of critical theory, critical pedagogy, and critical thinking skills which have inspired scholars to establish a critical perspective towards EFL textbooks considering the compounds of ideology and hegemony. In this paper, using a mixed method research design, qualitatively collected data through interviews and quantitatively gathered data through a questionnaire aimed to reveal the views of teachers/instructors and learners about the ideological and hegemonic practices contained in the EFL textbooks. The results of questionnaire and interview showed that ideology and hegemony are closely related to each other. Moreover, it is hard to give a clear-cut definition of these two terms because both textbooks and participants often used these two terms interchangeably. However, the participants declared diverse views on the underlying ideology and hegemonic practices in globally and locally written EFL textbooks.
英语教材中意识形态与霸权主义实践的批判性探究
英语霸权的不断扩大,使英语教学突然变成了一项国际业务,投入了巨大的资金,相应地,英语教材的生产也演变成了这一业务的基石。此外,近几十年来,由于批判理论、批判教育学和批判性思维技能的兴起,对意识形态、霸权和教科书之间关系的研究也在不断增加,这促使学者们从意识形态和霸权的综合体出发,对英语教材建立了批判性的视角。本文采用混合方法研究设计,通过访谈进行定性收集数据,通过问卷调查进行定量收集数据,旨在揭示教师/讲师和学习者对英语教科书中包含的意识形态和霸权实践的看法。问卷调查和访谈的结果表明,意识形态与霸权是密切相关的。此外,由于教科书和参与者经常交替使用这两个术语,因此很难对这两个术语给出明确的定义。然而,与会者对全球和本地编写的英语教科书中的潜在意识形态和霸权做法发表了不同的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信