The Case for Universal Health Insurance

Alex Rajczi
{"title":"The Case for Universal Health Insurance","authors":"Alex Rajczi","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190946838.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The previous chapters have examined three significant objections to universal health insurance—objections focused on fiscal risk, efficacy, and personal cost. This chapter synthesizes the responses to those concerns, revealing that they fit together into a single, coherent outlook on the ethics of health care. It is argued that in light of the considerations offered in previous chapters, the Affordable Care Act is problematic—deserving of support only in the face of inferior alternatives. In contrast, there are no similar problems with well-designed single-payer or regulated-market systems. The chapter concludes with some reflections on the next steps in a complete case for universal health insurance.","PeriodicalId":382250,"journal":{"name":"The Ethics of Universal Health Insurance","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Ethics of Universal Health Insurance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190946838.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The previous chapters have examined three significant objections to universal health insurance—objections focused on fiscal risk, efficacy, and personal cost. This chapter synthesizes the responses to those concerns, revealing that they fit together into a single, coherent outlook on the ethics of health care. It is argued that in light of the considerations offered in previous chapters, the Affordable Care Act is problematic—deserving of support only in the face of inferior alternatives. In contrast, there are no similar problems with well-designed single-payer or regulated-market systems. The chapter concludes with some reflections on the next steps in a complete case for universal health insurance.
全民健康保险的案例
前几章研究了对全民健康保险的三个重要反对意见——反对意见集中在财政风险、功效和个人成本上。本章综合了对这些问题的回应,揭示了它们合在一起形成了一个关于卫生保健伦理的单一、连贯的观点。有人认为,根据前几章提供的考虑,《平价医疗法案》是有问题的——只有在面对较差的替代方案时才值得支持。相比之下,设计良好的单一付款人或受监管的市场体系没有类似的问题。本章总结了对全民健康保险完整案例的后续步骤的一些思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信