優化健診顧客於放射科受檢流程

陳薇婷 陳薇婷, 陳國佑 陳國佑, 李俊憲 李俊憲
{"title":"優化健診顧客於放射科受檢流程","authors":"陳薇婷 陳薇婷, 陳國佑 陳國佑, 李俊憲 李俊憲","doi":"10.53106/199457952022111606009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 目的:本計畫針對健診顧客於放射科檢查之流程進行探討與改善,以提升健診顧客於放射科之顧客滿意度。 材料與方法:問卷製作參考PZB缺口模型理論,並以SERVQUAL量表作為模版,分為5大項,設計共23個題目。依據調查結果以「動線標示或指標清楚」、「檢查動線的流暢度」列為2大改善方向,改善方法利用資訊流如:路線指示影片、QR code、APP等。 結果:「動線標示或指標清楚」滿意度由87.2%提升至90.2% (p值=0.06);「檢查動線的流暢度」滿意度由87.8%明顯提升至92% (p值=0.02)。再將改善後23個問題的重視度及滿意度結果繪製成IPA (important performance analysis)分析圖,進行結果分析與探討。 結論:滿意度結合重視度一起分析,可以更客觀的瞭解顧客是否感到滿意,進而針對問題改善,可以有效的改善顧客滿意度。\n Aim: The accreditation of teaching hospitals encourages medical staff to present research papers. In this study, we sought to assist medical staff in resolving their research-related dilemma and developing their research interest and ability. Methods: The medical staff of XYZ hospital participated in this study. A questionnaire survey was conducted among the participants. The 28-item questionnaire included questions on the participants’ demographics, experiences related to research and journal submission, research needs, and some open‑ended questions. Results: In total, 113 questionnaires were returned. Of the participants, 54.9% had experience in research paper (mostly domestic journal publications and conference proceedings) presentation and 60% were interested in research. The participants regarded the following three tasks as obstacles to conducting research: data analysis, manuscript writing, and manuscript submission and revision. The participants’ ability to draft manuscripts and use statistical software needed improvements. Conclusions: Our findings and the participants’ feedback may serve as a reference for designing in-service courses and relevant policies for medical staff. Teaching hospitals should provide practical assistance to their medical staff for conducting research in addition to clinical practice.\n \n","PeriodicalId":260200,"journal":{"name":"醫療品質雜誌","volume":"155 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"醫療品質雜誌","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/199457952022111606009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

目的:本計畫針對健診顧客於放射科檢查之流程進行探討與改善,以提升健診顧客於放射科之顧客滿意度。 材料與方法:問卷製作參考PZB缺口模型理論,並以SERVQUAL量表作為模版,分為5大項,設計共23個題目。依據調查結果以「動線標示或指標清楚」、「檢查動線的流暢度」列為2大改善方向,改善方法利用資訊流如:路線指示影片、QR code、APP等。 結果:「動線標示或指標清楚」滿意度由87.2%提升至90.2% (p值=0.06);「檢查動線的流暢度」滿意度由87.8%明顯提升至92% (p值=0.02)。再將改善後23個問題的重視度及滿意度結果繪製成IPA (important performance analysis)分析圖,進行結果分析與探討。 結論:滿意度結合重視度一起分析,可以更客觀的瞭解顧客是否感到滿意,進而針對問題改善,可以有效的改善顧客滿意度。  Aim: The accreditation of teaching hospitals encourages medical staff to present research papers. In this study, we sought to assist medical staff in resolving their research-related dilemma and developing their research interest and ability. Methods: The medical staff of XYZ hospital participated in this study. A questionnaire survey was conducted among the participants. The 28-item questionnaire included questions on the participants’ demographics, experiences related to research and journal submission, research needs, and some open‑ended questions. Results: In total, 113 questionnaires were returned. Of the participants, 54.9% had experience in research paper (mostly domestic journal publications and conference proceedings) presentation and 60% were interested in research. The participants regarded the following three tasks as obstacles to conducting research: data analysis, manuscript writing, and manuscript submission and revision. The participants’ ability to draft manuscripts and use statistical software needed improvements. Conclusions: Our findings and the participants’ feedback may serve as a reference for designing in-service courses and relevant policies for medical staff. Teaching hospitals should provide practical assistance to their medical staff for conducting research in addition to clinical practice.  
优化健诊顾客于放射科受检流程
目的:本计划针对健诊顾客于放射科检查之流程进行探讨与改善,以提升健诊顾客于放射科之顾客满意度。 材料与方法:问卷制作参考PZB缺口模型理论,并以SERVQUAL量表作为模版,分为5大项,设计共23个题目。依据调查结果以「动线标示或指标清楚」、「检查动线的流畅度」列为2大改善方向,改善方法利用资讯流如:路线指示影片、QR code、APP等。 结果:「动线标示或指标清楚」满意度由87.2%提升至90.2% (p值=0.06);「检查动线的流畅度」满意度由87.8%明显提升至92% (p值=0.02)。再将改善后23个问题的重视度及满意度结果绘制成IPA (important performance analysis)分析图,进行结果分析与探讨。 结论:满意度结合重视度一起分析,可以更客观的了解顾客是否感到满意,进而针对问题改善,可以有效的改善顾客满意度。 Aim: The accreditation of teaching hospitals encourages medical staff to present research papers. In this study, we sought to assist medical staff in resolving their research-related dilemma and developing their research interest and ability. Methods: The medical staff of XYZ hospital participated in this study. A questionnaire survey was conducted among the participants. The 28-item questionnaire included questions on the participants’ demographics, experiences related to research and journal submission, research needs, and some open‑ended questions. Results: In total, 113 questionnaires were returned. Of the participants, 54.9% had experience in research paper (mostly domestic journal publications and conference proceedings) presentation and 60% were interested in research. The participants regarded the following three tasks as obstacles to conducting research: data analysis, manuscript writing, and manuscript submission and revision. The participants’ ability to draft manuscripts and use statistical software needed improvements. Conclusions: Our findings and the participants’ feedback may serve as a reference for designing in-service courses and relevant policies for medical staff. Teaching hospitals should provide practical assistance to their medical staff for conducting research in addition to clinical practice.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信