Explaining the Lack of Non-Public Actors in the USA Social Insurance System (Chapter 11 in Non-Public Actors in Social Security Administration: A Comparative Study)

Paul M. Secunda
{"title":"Explaining the Lack of Non-Public Actors in the USA Social Insurance System (Chapter 11 in Non-Public Actors in Social Security Administration: A Comparative Study)","authors":"Paul M. Secunda","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2029367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are currently very few non-public actors playing a role in the federal and state social insurance programs in the United States. Yet, “projected long-run program costs for both Medicare and Social Security are not sustainable under currently scheduled financing, and will require legislative corrections if disruptive consequences for beneficiaries and taxpayers are to be avoided.” As financial pressure increases on these programs, as it surely will, Americans may become more willing to go the privatization route and engage more non-public actors in the provision of social insurance.In the meantime, the paradox of the American social insurance system is that while disclaiming any desire for socialist-type programs, most Americans today believe that only the government should be responsible for providing the social insurance safety net. On the one hand, this could be because U.S. citizens are seeking to hold on to what meager social safety net they have left. On the other hand, scarred from the recent global recession and underhanded actions by many private investment firms and banks, most Americans are not yet ready to place their faith in these private actors, even if more efficiency, cost-savings, and activation could be achieved by doing so.What this all means is that unlike its counterparts in Europe, the United States social insurance system does not appear to have an incipient movement in which non-public actors will start to play a larger role in any American social insurance program in the near future. At the same time, the stability of the current system means there is unlikely to be the same diminishment in solidarity that is sometimes seen with the introduction of non-public actors into these programs in other countries.","PeriodicalId":177602,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Delivery & Financing eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Delivery & Financing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2029367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are currently very few non-public actors playing a role in the federal and state social insurance programs in the United States. Yet, “projected long-run program costs for both Medicare and Social Security are not sustainable under currently scheduled financing, and will require legislative corrections if disruptive consequences for beneficiaries and taxpayers are to be avoided.” As financial pressure increases on these programs, as it surely will, Americans may become more willing to go the privatization route and engage more non-public actors in the provision of social insurance.In the meantime, the paradox of the American social insurance system is that while disclaiming any desire for socialist-type programs, most Americans today believe that only the government should be responsible for providing the social insurance safety net. On the one hand, this could be because U.S. citizens are seeking to hold on to what meager social safety net they have left. On the other hand, scarred from the recent global recession and underhanded actions by many private investment firms and banks, most Americans are not yet ready to place their faith in these private actors, even if more efficiency, cost-savings, and activation could be achieved by doing so.What this all means is that unlike its counterparts in Europe, the United States social insurance system does not appear to have an incipient movement in which non-public actors will start to play a larger role in any American social insurance program in the near future. At the same time, the stability of the current system means there is unlikely to be the same diminishment in solidarity that is sometimes seen with the introduction of non-public actors into these programs in other countries.
解释美国社会保险制度中非公主体的缺失(《社会保障管理中的非公主体:比较研究》第十一章)
目前,在美国的联邦和州社会保险计划中,很少有非公共行为者发挥作用。然而,“在目前计划的融资下,医疗保险和社会保障计划的长期项目成本是不可持续的,如果要避免对受益人和纳税人造成破坏性后果,就需要立法纠正。”随着这些项目的财政压力增加,美国人可能会更愿意走私有化路线,让更多的非公共机构参与到社会保险的提供中来。与此同时,美国社会保险制度的悖论在于,虽然否认任何社会主义式计划的愿望,但大多数美国人今天认为只有政府应该负责提供社会保险安全网。一方面,这可能是因为美国公民正在寻求保住他们仅剩的微薄的社会安全网。另一方面,由于最近的全球经济衰退和许多私人投资公司和银行的卑鄙行为,大多数美国人还没有准备好信任这些私人行为者,即使这样做可以提高效率、节约成本和激活经济。这一切都意味着,与欧洲的同行不同,美国的社会保险制度似乎没有一个初期的运动,在不久的将来,非公共行为者将开始在任何美国社会保险计划中发挥更大的作用。与此同时,当前体系的稳定性意味着,不太可能出现其他国家在引入非公共行为者参与这些项目时出现的那种团结弱化现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信