Oakeshott and Rorty on the Nature of Philosophy

Damian Ilodigwe
{"title":"Oakeshott and Rorty on the Nature of Philosophy","authors":"Damian Ilodigwe","doi":"10.15640/ijpt.v7n1a4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. PREAMBLE Oakeshott was one of the philosophers Rorty acknowledged in his Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature in his effort to rethink the nature of philosophy, following his rejection of traditional epistemology and its associated concept of philosophy as the ground of all disciplines. More than Twenty years before the appearance of Rorty’s Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Oakeshott had introduced the category of conversation in conceptualizing the nature of philosophy, treating it as one of the many voices in the conversation of mankind. In adopting Oakeshott’s category in making his case for a new concept of philosophy Rorty, like Oakeshott, accentuates the claim of the voice of poetry, without affirming the special privilege of philosophy as moderator of other voices.","PeriodicalId":325304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Philosophy and Theology (IJPT)","volume":"152 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Philosophy and Theology (IJPT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15640/ijpt.v7n1a4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1. PREAMBLE Oakeshott was one of the philosophers Rorty acknowledged in his Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature in his effort to rethink the nature of philosophy, following his rejection of traditional epistemology and its associated concept of philosophy as the ground of all disciplines. More than Twenty years before the appearance of Rorty’s Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Oakeshott had introduced the category of conversation in conceptualizing the nature of philosophy, treating it as one of the many voices in the conversation of mankind. In adopting Oakeshott’s category in making his case for a new concept of philosophy Rorty, like Oakeshott, accentuates the claim of the voice of poetry, without affirming the special privilege of philosophy as moderator of other voices.
奥克肖特与罗蒂论哲学的本质
1. 奥克肖特是罗蒂在《哲学与自然之镜》中承认的哲学家之一,他在努力重新思考哲学的本质,之后他拒绝了传统认识论及其相关的哲学概念,将其作为所有学科的基础。早在罗蒂的《哲学与自然之镜》问世二十多年前,奥克肖特就在哲学的本质概念化中引入了对话范畴,将其视为人类对话中的众多声音之一。罗蒂和奥克肖特一样,在采用奥克肖特的范畴来提出新的哲学概念时,强调了诗歌之声的主张,而没有肯定哲学作为其他声音的调节者的特权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信