Analyzing the benefits of integrative multi-dimensional assessments of usability features in interaction-centered user studies

Verena Ermes, A. Janß, K. Radermacher, C. Röcker
{"title":"Analyzing the benefits of integrative multi-dimensional assessments of usability features in interaction-centered user studies","authors":"Verena Ermes, A. Janß, K. Radermacher, C. Röcker","doi":"10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.255142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, usability measures for the evaluation of systems and interfaces are mostly assessed in an isolated way. This paper addresses the question whether an integrative multi-dimensional feature evaluation can lead to different and more holistic results. We combined traditional measures (e.g., time to task completion) with advanced measures, like eye tracking, biosignal data logging and assessment of user emotions. For the evaluation of emotions, we used verbal methods (PAD Semantic Scale and a questionnaire) and a nonverbal method with EmoCards. The overall goal was to document and analyze the interaction as completely as possible (including effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction), focusing especially on objective measurements. Furthermore, the recording and assessment of emotions, which are part of the user experience, should give insights into user satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":120856,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare","volume":"18 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.255142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, usability measures for the evaluation of systems and interfaces are mostly assessed in an isolated way. This paper addresses the question whether an integrative multi-dimensional feature evaluation can lead to different and more holistic results. We combined traditional measures (e.g., time to task completion) with advanced measures, like eye tracking, biosignal data logging and assessment of user emotions. For the evaluation of emotions, we used verbal methods (PAD Semantic Scale and a questionnaire) and a nonverbal method with EmoCards. The overall goal was to document and analyze the interaction as completely as possible (including effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction), focusing especially on objective measurements. Furthermore, the recording and assessment of emotions, which are part of the user experience, should give insights into user satisfaction.
分析在以交互为中心的用户研究中对可用性特征进行综合多维评估的好处
今天,用于评估系统和接口的可用性措施大多以孤立的方式进行评估。本文讨论了一个综合的多维特征评价是否会导致不同的更全面的结果。我们将传统的测量方法(如完成任务的时间)与先进的测量方法(如眼动追踪、生物信号数据记录和用户情绪评估)结合起来。对于情绪的评估,我们使用了语言方法(PAD语义量表和问卷)和非语言方法(EmoCards)。总体目标是尽可能完整地记录和分析交互(包括有效性、效率和用户满意度),特别关注客观测量。此外,情绪的记录和评估,这是用户体验的一部分,应该提供洞察用户满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信