Parallel Image Matrix Compression for Face Recognition

Dong Xu, Shuicheng Yan, Lei Zhang, Mingjing Li, Wei-Ying Ma, Zhengkai Liu, HongJiang Zhang
{"title":"Parallel Image Matrix Compression for Face Recognition","authors":"Dong Xu, Shuicheng Yan, Lei Zhang, Mingjing Li, Wei-Ying Ma, Zhengkai Liu, HongJiang Zhang","doi":"10.1109/MMMC.2005.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The canonical face recognition algorithm Eigenface and Fisherface are both based on one dimensional vector representation. However, with the high feature dimensions and the small training data, face recognition often suffers from the curse of dimension and the small sample problem. Recent research [4] shows that face recognition based on direct 2D matrix representation, i.e. 2DPCA, obtains better performance than that based on traditional vector representation. However, there are three questions left unresolved in the 2DPCA algorithm: I ) what is the meaning of the eigenvalue and eigenvector of the covariance matrix in 2DPCA; 2) why 2DPCA can outperform Eigenface; and 3) how to reduce the dimension after 2DPCA directly. In this paper, we analyze 2DPCA in a different view and proof that is 2DPCA actually a \"localized\" PCA with each row vector of an image as object. With this explanation, we discover the intrinsic reason that 2DPCA can outperform Eigenface is because fewer feature dimensions and more samples are used in 2DPCA when compared with Eigenface. To further reduce the dimension after 2DPCA, a two-stage strategy, namely parallel image matrix compression (PIMC), is proposed to compress the image matrix redundancy, which exists among row vectors and column vectors. The exhaustive experiment results demonstrate that PIMC is superior to 2DPCA and Eigenface, and PIMC+LDA outperforms 2DPC+LDA and Fisherface.","PeriodicalId":121228,"journal":{"name":"11th International Multimedia Modelling Conference","volume":"7 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"11th International Multimedia Modelling Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMMC.2005.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The canonical face recognition algorithm Eigenface and Fisherface are both based on one dimensional vector representation. However, with the high feature dimensions and the small training data, face recognition often suffers from the curse of dimension and the small sample problem. Recent research [4] shows that face recognition based on direct 2D matrix representation, i.e. 2DPCA, obtains better performance than that based on traditional vector representation. However, there are three questions left unresolved in the 2DPCA algorithm: I ) what is the meaning of the eigenvalue and eigenvector of the covariance matrix in 2DPCA; 2) why 2DPCA can outperform Eigenface; and 3) how to reduce the dimension after 2DPCA directly. In this paper, we analyze 2DPCA in a different view and proof that is 2DPCA actually a "localized" PCA with each row vector of an image as object. With this explanation, we discover the intrinsic reason that 2DPCA can outperform Eigenface is because fewer feature dimensions and more samples are used in 2DPCA when compared with Eigenface. To further reduce the dimension after 2DPCA, a two-stage strategy, namely parallel image matrix compression (PIMC), is proposed to compress the image matrix redundancy, which exists among row vectors and column vectors. The exhaustive experiment results demonstrate that PIMC is superior to 2DPCA and Eigenface, and PIMC+LDA outperforms 2DPC+LDA and Fisherface.
并行图像矩阵压缩用于人脸识别
典型的人脸识别算法Eigenface和Fisherface都是基于一维向量表示的。然而,由于特征维数高,训练数据量小,人脸识别往往存在维数诅咒和小样本问题。最近的研究[4]表明,基于直接二维矩阵表示的人脸识别,即2DPCA,比基于传统向量表示的人脸识别获得了更好的性能。然而,在2DPCA算法中,有三个问题没有得到解决:1)2DPCA中协方差矩阵的特征值和特征向量的含义是什么;2)为什么2DPCA优于Eigenface;3) 2DPCA后如何直接降维。在本文中,我们从不同的角度分析2DPCA,并证明2DPCA实际上是一个以图像的每个行向量为对象的“局部”PCA。通过这一解释,我们发现了2DPCA优于Eigenface的内在原因,因为与Eigenface相比,2DPCA使用了更少的特征维度和更多的样本。为了进一步降低2DPCA后的维数,提出了一种两阶段并行图像矩阵压缩(PIMC)策略来压缩存在于行向量和列向量之间的图像矩阵冗余。详尽的实验结果表明,PIMC优于2DPCA和Eigenface, PIMC+LDA优于2DPC+LDA和Fisherface。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信