The Impact of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use on Student's Performance in Mandatory E-Learning Use

Mahendra Adhi Nugroho, Patriani Wahyu Dewanti, Budi Tiara Novitasari
{"title":"The Impact of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use on Student's Performance in Mandatory E-Learning Use","authors":"Mahendra Adhi Nugroho, Patriani Wahyu Dewanti, Budi Tiara Novitasari","doi":"10.1109/ICAITI.2018.8686742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research raises the issue related to perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use impact on performance when a system is mandatory implemented. This research tested the impact of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in the use of mandatory e-learning in relation to the students' performance. The sample included 247 students participating in classes adopting e-learning. To gather the data, online questionnaire is distributed to the sample. Furthermore, the gathered data is analyzed by using Partial Least Square (PLS). The research result indicated that all hypotheses are rejected. Based on the hypothesis testing, perceived usefulness does not affect students' performance, indicated with its P-value 0.8561 (H1). Also, perceived ease of use does not affect students' performance, indicated with its P-value 0.4466 (H2). Based on the hypothesis testing, it is concluded that when there is an obligation to utilize the implemented system, perceived of usefulness and perceived ease of use do not affect the user's performance.","PeriodicalId":233598,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Applied Information Technology and Innovation (ICAITI)","volume":"4 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Applied Information Technology and Innovation (ICAITI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAITI.2018.8686742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This research raises the issue related to perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use impact on performance when a system is mandatory implemented. This research tested the impact of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in the use of mandatory e-learning in relation to the students' performance. The sample included 247 students participating in classes adopting e-learning. To gather the data, online questionnaire is distributed to the sample. Furthermore, the gathered data is analyzed by using Partial Least Square (PLS). The research result indicated that all hypotheses are rejected. Based on the hypothesis testing, perceived usefulness does not affect students' performance, indicated with its P-value 0.8561 (H1). Also, perceived ease of use does not affect students' performance, indicated with its P-value 0.4466 (H2). Based on the hypothesis testing, it is concluded that when there is an obligation to utilize the implemented system, perceived of usefulness and perceived ease of use do not affect the user's performance.
感知有用性和感知易用性对学生强制性使用电子学习表现的影响
当系统被强制实现时,本研究提出了与感知有用性和感知易用性对性能的影响相关的问题。本研究测试了强制性电子学习中感知有用性和感知易用性对学生成绩的影响。样本包括247名参加电子学习课程的学生。为了收集数据,我们向样本发放了在线问卷。此外,收集到的数据使用偏最小二乘法(PLS)进行分析。研究结果表明,所有假设都被否定。通过假设检验,感知有用性不影响学生的学习成绩,其p值为0.8561 (H1)。感知易用性不影响学生成绩,p值为0.4466 (H2)。在假设检验的基础上得出结论,当用户有义务使用所实施的系统时,感知到的有用性和感知到的易用性并不影响用户的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信