Towards Issue Recommendation for Open Source Communities

Ralph Samer, A. Felfernig, Martin Stettinger
{"title":"Towards Issue Recommendation for Open Source Communities","authors":"Ralph Samer, A. Felfernig, Martin Stettinger","doi":"10.1145/3350546.3352514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In open source software development, a major challenge is the prioritization of new requirements as well as the identification of responsible developers for their implementation. Unlike conventional industrial software development, where requirements engineers have to explicitly define who implements what, in the context of open source development, developers (contributors) usually decide on their own which requirements to implement next. Contributors have to deal with a huge number of requirements where the recognition of the most relevant ones often becomes a crucial task with a high impact on the success of a software project. This fact defines our major motivation for the development of a prioritization tool for the ECLIPSE community which recommends relevant requirements (issues/bugs) to open source developers. Our tool uses real-world data from ECLIPSE in order to build a prediction model. We trained and tested our tool with different classifiers such as Naive Bayes (representing our baseline), Decision Tree, and Random Forest. The evaluation results indicate that the Random Forest classifier correctly predicts issues with a precision of 0.88 (F1-score 0.68).CCS CONCEPTS• Information systems → Recommender systems; • Humancentered computing → Open source software; • Computing methodologies → Machine learning approaches; Natural language processing; • Software and its engineering → Requirements analysis.","PeriodicalId":171168,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)","volume":"24 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3350546.3352514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In open source software development, a major challenge is the prioritization of new requirements as well as the identification of responsible developers for their implementation. Unlike conventional industrial software development, where requirements engineers have to explicitly define who implements what, in the context of open source development, developers (contributors) usually decide on their own which requirements to implement next. Contributors have to deal with a huge number of requirements where the recognition of the most relevant ones often becomes a crucial task with a high impact on the success of a software project. This fact defines our major motivation for the development of a prioritization tool for the ECLIPSE community which recommends relevant requirements (issues/bugs) to open source developers. Our tool uses real-world data from ECLIPSE in order to build a prediction model. We trained and tested our tool with different classifiers such as Naive Bayes (representing our baseline), Decision Tree, and Random Forest. The evaluation results indicate that the Random Forest classifier correctly predicts issues with a precision of 0.88 (F1-score 0.68).CCS CONCEPTS• Information systems → Recommender systems; • Humancentered computing → Open source software; • Computing methodologies → Machine learning approaches; Natural language processing; • Software and its engineering → Requirements analysis.
面向开源社区的问题建议
在开源软件开发中,一个主要的挑战是新需求的优先级排序,以及确定负责实现这些需求的开发人员。与传统的工业软件开发不同,在传统的工业软件开发中,需求工程师必须明确地定义谁来实现什么,在开源开发的环境中,开发人员(贡献者)通常自己决定下一步要实现哪些需求。贡献者必须处理大量的需求,其中识别最相关的需求通常成为对软件项目成功有重大影响的关键任务。这一事实定义了我们为ECLIPSE社区开发优先级工具的主要动机,该工具向开源开发人员推荐相关需求(问题/错误)。我们的工具使用来自ECLIPSE的真实数据来构建预测模型。我们用不同的分类器来训练和测试我们的工具,比如朴素贝叶斯(代表我们的基线)、决策树和随机森林。评价结果表明,随机森林分类器正确预测问题的精度为0.88 (f1得分为0.68)。•信息系统→推荐系统;•以人为本→开源软件;•计算方法→机器学习方法;自然语言处理;•软件及其工程→需求分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信