{"title":"The Share System in Open-Access and Optimally Regulated Fisheries","authors":"L. Anderson","doi":"10.2307/3145691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the share system is almost universal in fisheries throughout the world, it has received little treatment in the literature, the exceptions being papers by Zoeteweij (1956), Sutinen (1979), and Griffin, Lacewell, and Nichols (1976). The latter shows that a share system can divide the rent from the fishery between vessel owners and crew members. See Anderson (1982), however. This paper introduces the share system into the traditional static deterministic model of an exploited fishery, as described in Gordon (1954), Christy and Scott (1965), and Anderson (1977). The model will then be used to answer the following questions: (1) How is the share rate determined and how will it affect open-access fishing and the rents earned by boat owners and crew? (2) How will imperfect competition in the determination of the share rate affect open-access fishing and rent distribution? (3) What are the implications of the share system for management, and do they differ depending on how the share rate is determined? The next section will present the basic elements of this new model and use them to derive the results of the traditional model. The third section shows that if fishing effort can be produced using variable proportions and if the crew has some control over the input mix, then the least cost combination of inputs will not be used unless variable costs and revenues are shared at the same rate. The new model will be derived in the fourth section. The next few sections use the model to answer the above questions. A concluding section summarizes the main results and makes several generalizations from the conclusions. While it is generally agreed that a main purpose of the share system is to spread risks between boat owners and crews, the model presented here is deterministic. A stochastic model was not used because it would unnecessarily complicate the analysis without adding much to the essential points to be made.","PeriodicalId":305766,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Economics","volume":"70 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3145691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Although the share system is almost universal in fisheries throughout the world, it has received little treatment in the literature, the exceptions being papers by Zoeteweij (1956), Sutinen (1979), and Griffin, Lacewell, and Nichols (1976). The latter shows that a share system can divide the rent from the fishery between vessel owners and crew members. See Anderson (1982), however. This paper introduces the share system into the traditional static deterministic model of an exploited fishery, as described in Gordon (1954), Christy and Scott (1965), and Anderson (1977). The model will then be used to answer the following questions: (1) How is the share rate determined and how will it affect open-access fishing and the rents earned by boat owners and crew? (2) How will imperfect competition in the determination of the share rate affect open-access fishing and rent distribution? (3) What are the implications of the share system for management, and do they differ depending on how the share rate is determined? The next section will present the basic elements of this new model and use them to derive the results of the traditional model. The third section shows that if fishing effort can be produced using variable proportions and if the crew has some control over the input mix, then the least cost combination of inputs will not be used unless variable costs and revenues are shared at the same rate. The new model will be derived in the fourth section. The next few sections use the model to answer the above questions. A concluding section summarizes the main results and makes several generalizations from the conclusions. While it is generally agreed that a main purpose of the share system is to spread risks between boat owners and crews, the model presented here is deterministic. A stochastic model was not used because it would unnecessarily complicate the analysis without adding much to the essential points to be made.
虽然份额制度在全世界的渔业中几乎是普遍的,但它在文献中很少得到处理,只有Zoeteweij (1956), Sutinen(1979)和Griffin, Lacewell, and Nichols(1976)的论文是例外。后者表明,共享制度可以将渔场租金分配给船东和船员。然而,参见Anderson(1982)。本文将份额制度引入到传统的被开发渔业静态确定性模型中,如Gordon(1954)、Christy and Scott(1965)和Anderson(1977)所描述的那样。然后,该模型将用于回答以下问题:(1)份额率是如何确定的,它将如何影响开放捕鱼以及船主和船员所赚取的租金?(2)份额决定中的不完全竞争将如何影响开放捕捞和租金分配?(3)股权制度对管理层的影响是什么?它们是否因如何确定股权比例而有所不同?下一节将介绍这个新模型的基本元素,并使用它们来推导传统模型的结果。第三部分表明,如果捕鱼努力量可以使用可变比例来生产,并且如果船员对投入组合有一定的控制权,那么除非可变成本和收入以相同的比率分摊,否则将不会使用成本最低的投入组合。第四部分将推导出新的模型。接下来的几节将使用该模型回答上述问题。结论部分总结了主要结果,并从结论中做出了一些概括。虽然人们普遍认为,分担制度的主要目的是在船主和船员之间分散风险,但这里提出的模型是确定性的。没有使用随机模型,因为它会使分析不必要地复杂化,而不会增加要提出的要点。