Case Study:

Wiwik Andreani
{"title":"Case Study:","authors":"Wiwik Andreani","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv14h4jt.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This study examines how peer and teacher feedback help learners improve their grammatical accuracy in their written work. It is a longitudinal case study with twelve participants of an EFL Grammar class. They did two self editing tasks and three self-correction tasks on the same written work. In doing the self-correction activities, the learners received three kinds of feedback: direct peer feedback and two kinds of indirect feedback from the teacher. The study found that indirect teacher feedback, in the form of metalanguage comments and underlining errors, gave the biggest contribution to the learners' language accuracy. However, in regard to the consistently corrected errors, peer feedback outperformed teacher feedback in its contribution. The result showed that both direct and indirect feedbacks were beneficial for the learners to raise their awareness towards becoming independent self-editors.","PeriodicalId":297108,"journal":{"name":"Political Orthodoxies","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Orthodoxies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv14h4jt.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This study examines how peer and teacher feedback help learners improve their grammatical accuracy in their written work. It is a longitudinal case study with twelve participants of an EFL Grammar class. They did two self editing tasks and three self-correction tasks on the same written work. In doing the self-correction activities, the learners received three kinds of feedback: direct peer feedback and two kinds of indirect feedback from the teacher. The study found that indirect teacher feedback, in the form of metalanguage comments and underlining errors, gave the biggest contribution to the learners' language accuracy. However, in regard to the consistently corrected errors, peer feedback outperformed teacher feedback in its contribution. The result showed that both direct and indirect feedbacks were beneficial for the learners to raise their awareness towards becoming independent self-editors.
案例研究:
本研究考察同伴和老师的反馈如何帮助学习者提高书面作业中的语法准确性。这是一项纵向案例研究,有12名参与者参加了英语语法课。他们对同一份书面作业进行了两次自我编辑和三次自我校正。在自我纠正活动中,学习者得到三种反馈:同伴的直接反馈和教师的两种间接反馈。研究发现,教师的间接反馈,以元语言评论和划线错误的形式,对学习者的语言准确性贡献最大。然而,在持续纠正错误方面,同伴反馈的贡献超过了教师反馈。结果表明,直接反馈和间接反馈都有利于学习者提高自主编辑意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信