To type or to speak? The effect of input modality on text understanding during note-taking

A. A. Khan, Sadia Nawaz, Joshua Newn, Ryan M. Kelly, J. Lodge, James Bailey, Eduardo Velloso
{"title":"To type or to speak? The effect of input modality on text understanding during note-taking","authors":"A. A. Khan, Sadia Nawaz, Joshua Newn, Ryan M. Kelly, J. Lodge, James Bailey, Eduardo Velloso","doi":"10.1145/3491102.3501974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though recent technological advances have enabled note-taking through different modalities (e.g., keyboard, digital ink, voice), there is still a lack of understanding of the effect of the modality choice on learning. In this paper, we compared two note-taking input modalities—keyboard and voice—to study their effects on participants’ understanding of learning content. We conducted a study with 60 participants in which they were asked to take notes using voice or keyboard on two independent digital text passages while also making a judgment about their performance on an upcoming test. We built mixed-effects models to examine the effect of the note-taking modality on learners’ text comprehension, the content of notes and their meta-comprehension judgement. Our findings suggest that taking notes using voice leads to a higher conceptual understanding of the text when compared to typing the notes. We also found that using voice triggers generative processes that result in learners taking more elaborate and comprehensive notes. The findings of the study imply that note-taking tools designed for digital learning environments could incorporate voice as an input modality to promote effective note-taking and higher conceptual understanding of the text.","PeriodicalId":269130,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"70 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Though recent technological advances have enabled note-taking through different modalities (e.g., keyboard, digital ink, voice), there is still a lack of understanding of the effect of the modality choice on learning. In this paper, we compared two note-taking input modalities—keyboard and voice—to study their effects on participants’ understanding of learning content. We conducted a study with 60 participants in which they were asked to take notes using voice or keyboard on two independent digital text passages while also making a judgment about their performance on an upcoming test. We built mixed-effects models to examine the effect of the note-taking modality on learners’ text comprehension, the content of notes and their meta-comprehension judgement. Our findings suggest that taking notes using voice leads to a higher conceptual understanding of the text when compared to typing the notes. We also found that using voice triggers generative processes that result in learners taking more elaborate and comprehensive notes. The findings of the study imply that note-taking tools designed for digital learning environments could incorporate voice as an input modality to promote effective note-taking and higher conceptual understanding of the text.
打字还是说话?笔记过程中输入方式对文本理解的影响
尽管最近的技术进步使人们能够通过不同的方式(如键盘、数字墨水、语音)记笔记,但人们仍然缺乏对方式选择对学习的影响的理解。在本文中,我们比较了键盘和语音两种笔记输入方式,以研究它们对学习内容理解的影响。我们对60名参与者进行了一项研究,要求他们在两个独立的数字文本段落上用语音或键盘做笔记,同时对他们在即将到来的测试中的表现做出判断。我们建立了混合效应模型来检验笔记方式对学习者文本理解、笔记内容和元理解判断的影响。我们的研究结果表明,与打字笔记相比,用声音记笔记可以提高对文本的概念性理解。我们还发现,使用语音触发生成过程,导致学习者做更详细和全面的笔记。研究结果表明,为数字学习环境设计的笔记工具可以将语音作为一种输入方式,以促进有效的笔记和对文本的更高概念理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信