Are Capital Expenditures, R&D, Advertisements and Acquisitions Positive NPV?

Peter B. Vassallo
{"title":"Are Capital Expenditures, R&D, Advertisements and Acquisitions Positive NPV?","authors":"Peter B. Vassallo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2139880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite evidence on differences in how classes of investments correlate with present and future firm returns (Titman and Xie 2004; Eberhart et al, 2004), the literature does not yet show whether net present values across investment classes, imputed from contemporaneous firm returns, are distinct from the effects of measurement conservatism of assets in place. In this paper, I extend Easton and Pae (2004) to examine how, distinctly from measurement conservatism, investors’ NPV expectations vary across (i) GAAP-expensed and GAAP-capitalized investment classes and (ii) within these classes, across firm-level conditions associated with value/growth, profit/loss and net financial leverage levels. I find that, while NPV’s vary in the order of risk associated with respective investment classes, significant variation in NPV is driven by firm level conditions. These variations relate to other, non-financial information associated with high growth firms (Donelson and Resutek, 2012), greater value in capacity-expanding investments in loss making firms and higher NPV from investments in firms with negative financial leverage. The results in this study will thus assist analysts evaluating NPV from firm-specific investments to control for the influence of measurement conditions of existing assets and better evaluate reliability of investments’ NPV due to variation in firm-level conditions.","PeriodicalId":129035,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Asset Pricing","volume":"105 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Asset Pricing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2139880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite evidence on differences in how classes of investments correlate with present and future firm returns (Titman and Xie 2004; Eberhart et al, 2004), the literature does not yet show whether net present values across investment classes, imputed from contemporaneous firm returns, are distinct from the effects of measurement conservatism of assets in place. In this paper, I extend Easton and Pae (2004) to examine how, distinctly from measurement conservatism, investors’ NPV expectations vary across (i) GAAP-expensed and GAAP-capitalized investment classes and (ii) within these classes, across firm-level conditions associated with value/growth, profit/loss and net financial leverage levels. I find that, while NPV’s vary in the order of risk associated with respective investment classes, significant variation in NPV is driven by firm level conditions. These variations relate to other, non-financial information associated with high growth firms (Donelson and Resutek, 2012), greater value in capacity-expanding investments in loss making firms and higher NPV from investments in firms with negative financial leverage. The results in this study will thus assist analysts evaluating NPV from firm-specific investments to control for the influence of measurement conditions of existing assets and better evaluate reliability of investments’ NPV due to variation in firm-level conditions.
资本支出、研发、广告和收购是正NPV吗?
尽管有证据表明投资类别与当前和未来公司回报的相关性存在差异(Titman and Xie 2004;Eberhart等人,2004),但文献尚未表明,从同期公司回报推算出的各投资类别的净现值是否与现有资产的测量稳健性的影响不同。在本文中,我扩展了Easton和Pae(2004)来研究投资者的NPV预期如何在(I) gaap费用化和gaap资本化的投资类别以及(ii)在这些类别中,与价值/增长、利润/亏损和净财务杠杆水平相关的公司层面条件下发生变化,这与测量保守性不同。我发现,虽然NPV在与各自投资类别相关的风险顺序上有所不同,但NPV的显著变化是由公司层面的条件驱动的。这些变化涉及到与高增长企业相关的其他非财务信息(Donelson和Resutek, 2012),亏损企业的产能扩张投资价值更高,以及负财务杠杆企业的投资NPV更高。因此,本研究的结果将有助于分析师评估企业特定投资的NPV,以控制现有资产计量条件的影响,并更好地评估由于企业层面条件变化而导致的投资NPV的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信