Statutory auditor's profile and computer assisted audit tools and techniques' acceptance: indicators on firms and peers' influence

I. Pedrosa, C. Costa
{"title":"Statutory auditor's profile and computer assisted audit tools and techniques' acceptance: indicators on firms and peers' influence","authors":"I. Pedrosa, C. Costa","doi":"10.1145/2618168.2618172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, statutory auditors' profiles will be defined on Computer Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques' intention to use and use concerning the influence of statutory auditors firms' dimension (number of collaborators, number of financial auditors and number of statutory auditors), peers impact (other statutory auditors and the professional group influence on the professional context) and social influence (people and firm support). Additionally, previous research on the experience with tools and its influence on the acceptance are documented this research group, and also the professional experience (number of years of professional experience). The variety of computer assisted audit tools available in the firm and its impact on the acceptance is also addressed. In the reference group, was possible to conclude that firm dimension, peers and social influence and experience have a positive impact on Computer Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques' acceptance. However, the number of available tools has a negative impact on intention to use confirming that is not relevant to have several tools but to be expert in one or two tools.","PeriodicalId":192346,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Information Systems and Design of Communication","volume":"68 14","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Information Systems and Design of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2618168.2618172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In this paper, statutory auditors' profiles will be defined on Computer Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques' intention to use and use concerning the influence of statutory auditors firms' dimension (number of collaborators, number of financial auditors and number of statutory auditors), peers impact (other statutory auditors and the professional group influence on the professional context) and social influence (people and firm support). Additionally, previous research on the experience with tools and its influence on the acceptance are documented this research group, and also the professional experience (number of years of professional experience). The variety of computer assisted audit tools available in the firm and its impact on the acceptance is also addressed. In the reference group, was possible to conclude that firm dimension, peers and social influence and experience have a positive impact on Computer Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques' acceptance. However, the number of available tools has a negative impact on intention to use confirming that is not relevant to have several tools but to be expert in one or two tools.
法定审计师的形象与计算机辅助审计工具和技术的接受度:事务所和同行影响力的指标
在本文中,法定审计师的概况将根据法定审计师事务所维度(合作者数量、财务审计师数量和法定审计师数量)、同行影响(其他法定审计师和专业团体对专业背景的影响)和社会影响(人员和公司支持)的影响来定义,并使用计算机辅助审计工具和技术。此外,之前关于工具使用经验及其对接受程度的影响的研究也记录在本研究组,以及专业经验(专业经验的年数)中。本文还讨论了公司中可用的各种计算机辅助审计工具及其对验收的影响。在参照组中,可以得出这样的结论:企业维度、同伴、社会影响和经验对计算机辅助审计工具和技术的接受度有积极的影响。然而,可用工具的数量对使用意图有负面影响,这与拥有几个工具无关,而是与精通一两个工具有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信