Second Meeting

{"title":"Second Meeting","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/S0068673500010348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(1) The objection that a verb cannot be borrowed at all \" except under special (e. g. political) conditions \" was unfounded, as also (2) were the objections that a verb cannot be transferred \"in a particular tense, and that tense only, from one language to another,\" and that a verb cannot \"be 'borrowed' with its tensetermination affixed.\" (3) The third a of avao-axcT was manifestly due to wrongly assumed connexion with Osc. sakrim 'sacrum' sakahi ter ' sanciatur' aaxopo ' sacrum' etc. Parallels hereto were cited in support of this view. (4) Doubt was thrown on the alleged use of the symbol ^ to represent Osc. f; and further, granting for sake of argument that Fensernum had invented a symbol i =f, it was shewn that even so the S of avaScucer and Stories could not be this symbol i.","PeriodicalId":177773,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500010348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(1) The objection that a verb cannot be borrowed at all " except under special (e. g. political) conditions " was unfounded, as also (2) were the objections that a verb cannot be transferred "in a particular tense, and that tense only, from one language to another," and that a verb cannot "be 'borrowed' with its tensetermination affixed." (3) The third a of avao-axcT was manifestly due to wrongly assumed connexion with Osc. sakrim 'sacrum' sakahi ter ' sanciatur' aaxopo ' sacrum' etc. Parallels hereto were cited in support of this view. (4) Doubt was thrown on the alleged use of the symbol ^ to represent Osc. f; and further, granting for sake of argument that Fensernum had invented a symbol i =f, it was shewn that even so the S of avaScucer and Stories could not be this symbol i.
第二次会议
(1)“除非在特殊(如政治)条件下”,动词根本不能借用的反对意见是没有根据的,(2)动词不能“以一种特定的时态,而且只能以这种时态,从一种语言转移到另一种语言”的反对意见也是没有根据的,动词不能“带有定时态的‘借用’”。(3) avao-axcT的第三个a明显是由于错误地假设了与Osc的联系。Sakrim 'sacrum' sakahi ' sanciatur' aaxopo 'sacrum'等等。有人引用了这一观点的相似之处。(4)有人怀疑涉嫌使用符号^代表Osc。f;此外,为了论证起见,假定芬瑟纳姆发明了一个符号i =f,但事实证明,即使如此,《阿凡达》和《故事》中的S也不可能是这个符号i。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信