Essential Facilities and Trinko: Should Antitrust and Regulation Be Combined?

T. Brennan
{"title":"Essential Facilities and Trinko: Should Antitrust and Regulation Be Combined?","authors":"T. Brennan","doi":"10.13016/M2YF6P-IDRQ","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I. INTRODUCTION II. COMPARING A TT it reinforced it in granting securities law precedent over antitrust in its 2007 decision in Credit Suisse Securities v. Billing. (12) The implicit assumption in the recent decisions is that regulation and antitrust are substitute methods for controlling market power. In fact, regulation and antitrust are complementary in this context, as well as in others. (13) Absent regulatory constraints on the direct exercise of market power over the local exchange (AT&T) or network elements (Trinko) through monopoly pricing, the regulated firm would have no incentive to subvert competition in related markets. …","PeriodicalId":423100,"journal":{"name":"Federal Communications Law Journal","volume":"29 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal Communications Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13016/M2YF6P-IDRQ","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

I. INTRODUCTION II. COMPARING A TT it reinforced it in granting securities law precedent over antitrust in its 2007 decision in Credit Suisse Securities v. Billing. (12) The implicit assumption in the recent decisions is that regulation and antitrust are substitute methods for controlling market power. In fact, regulation and antitrust are complementary in this context, as well as in others. (13) Absent regulatory constraints on the direct exercise of market power over the local exchange (AT&T) or network elements (Trinko) through monopoly pricing, the regulated firm would have no incentive to subvert competition in related markets. …
基本设施和Trinko:反垄断和监管应该合并吗?
1 .引言;在2007年瑞士信贷证券诉Billing案的判决中,联邦法院在授予证券法反垄断先例方面加强了这一点。(12)在最近的决定中隐含的假设是,管制和反垄断是控制市场力量的替代方法。事实上,在这种情况下,监管和反垄断是互补的,在其他情况下也是如此。(13)如果没有对通过垄断定价对当地交易所(AT&T)或网络要素(Trinko)直接行使市场力量的监管约束,受监管的公司将没有动机在相关市场中颠覆竞争。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信