Comparison of Search Ability between Genetic Fuzzy Rule Selection and Fuzzy Genetics-Based Machine Learning

Y. Nojima, H. Ishibuchi, I. Kuwajima
{"title":"Comparison of Search Ability between Genetic Fuzzy Rule Selection and Fuzzy Genetics-Based Machine Learning","authors":"Y. Nojima, H. Ishibuchi, I. Kuwajima","doi":"10.1109/ISEFS.2006.251148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We developed two GA-based schemes for the design of fuzzy rule-based classification systems. One is genetic rule selection and the other is genetics-based machine learning (GBML). In our genetic rule selection scheme, first a large number of promising fuzzy rules are extracted from numerical data in a heuristic manner as candidate rules. Then a genetic algorithm is used to select a small number of fuzzy rules. A rule set is represented by a binary string whose length is equal to the number of candidate rules. On the other hand, a fuzzy rule is denoted by its antecedent fuzzy sets as an integer substring in our GBML scheme. A rule set is represented by a concatenated integer string. In this paper, we compare these two schemes in terms of their search ability to efficiently find compact fuzzy rule-based classification systems with high accuracy. The main difference between these two schemes is that GBML has a huge search space consisting of all combinations of possible fuzzy rules while genetic rule selection has a much smaller search space with only candidate rules","PeriodicalId":269492,"journal":{"name":"2006 International Symposium on Evolving Fuzzy Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 International Symposium on Evolving Fuzzy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEFS.2006.251148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We developed two GA-based schemes for the design of fuzzy rule-based classification systems. One is genetic rule selection and the other is genetics-based machine learning (GBML). In our genetic rule selection scheme, first a large number of promising fuzzy rules are extracted from numerical data in a heuristic manner as candidate rules. Then a genetic algorithm is used to select a small number of fuzzy rules. A rule set is represented by a binary string whose length is equal to the number of candidate rules. On the other hand, a fuzzy rule is denoted by its antecedent fuzzy sets as an integer substring in our GBML scheme. A rule set is represented by a concatenated integer string. In this paper, we compare these two schemes in terms of their search ability to efficiently find compact fuzzy rule-based classification systems with high accuracy. The main difference between these two schemes is that GBML has a huge search space consisting of all combinations of possible fuzzy rules while genetic rule selection has a much smaller search space with only candidate rules
遗传模糊规则选择与基于模糊遗传的机器学习搜索能力比较
我们开发了两种基于遗传算法的模糊规则分类系统设计方案。一种是遗传规则选择,另一种是基于遗传的机器学习(GBML)。在遗传规则选择方案中,首先以启发式方法从数值数据中提取大量有前途的模糊规则作为候选规则;然后采用遗传算法选择少量模糊规则。规则集由二进制字符串表示,其长度等于候选规则的数量。另一方面,在我们的GBML格式中,模糊规则被表示为一个整数子串。规则集由连接的整数字符串表示。在本文中,我们比较了这两种方案的搜索能力,以高效、高精度地找到紧凑的基于模糊规则的分类系统。这两种方案的主要区别在于,GBML具有由所有可能的模糊规则组合组成的巨大搜索空间,而遗传规则选择的搜索空间要小得多,只有候选规则
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信