Factors Affecting Bevameter Soil Characterization

S. Els, H. Hamersma, R. Kruger
{"title":"Factors Affecting Bevameter Soil Characterization","authors":"S. Els, H. Hamersma, R. Kruger","doi":"10.56884/ikrl4697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Bekker-Wong soil-wheel interaction model has been widely adopted in the terramechanics community. This approach requires data measured with a Bevameter. The Bevameter test includes a pressure-sinkage test and a shear strength test. Although the original intention of the Bevameter method is to closely replicate the interaction between the wheel/track and the soil, tests are often done at lower vertical loads with smaller contact areas to keep tests within practical experimental limits. The traditional Bevameter shear strength test, which uses a rotational shear ring with grousers, tends to overpredict the drawbar pull of vehicles by 30 to 40% [(Chang and Baker, 1973, Shoop, 1993)]. Translational shear arguably more closely resembles the shear mechanism that occurs between a wheel/track and the soil. The literature indicates that terramechanics investigations are significantly influenced by soil condition and preparation. This study investigates (a) the influence of soil preparation on the pressure-sinkage and shear-displacement relationship of sandy soil, (b) the influence of the shearing mechanism on shear strength, and (c) the influence of shear contact area on shear strength. Experimental results indicate that soil preparation has a substantial influence on the pressure-sinkage relationship. The shearing mechanism was investigated by comparing traditional rotational shear with translational shear. The findings indicate that the shearing mechanism may explain the overprediction of shear strength typical of rotational shear tests. The shear contact area also exhibits a significant influence on the measured shear strength. Further investigation into the shear mechanism and size and shape of the shear contact area is recommended.","PeriodicalId":447600,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific Regional Conference of the ISTVS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific Regional Conference of the ISTVS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56884/ikrl4697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Bekker-Wong soil-wheel interaction model has been widely adopted in the terramechanics community. This approach requires data measured with a Bevameter. The Bevameter test includes a pressure-sinkage test and a shear strength test. Although the original intention of the Bevameter method is to closely replicate the interaction between the wheel/track and the soil, tests are often done at lower vertical loads with smaller contact areas to keep tests within practical experimental limits. The traditional Bevameter shear strength test, which uses a rotational shear ring with grousers, tends to overpredict the drawbar pull of vehicles by 30 to 40% [(Chang and Baker, 1973, Shoop, 1993)]. Translational shear arguably more closely resembles the shear mechanism that occurs between a wheel/track and the soil. The literature indicates that terramechanics investigations are significantly influenced by soil condition and preparation. This study investigates (a) the influence of soil preparation on the pressure-sinkage and shear-displacement relationship of sandy soil, (b) the influence of the shearing mechanism on shear strength, and (c) the influence of shear contact area on shear strength. Experimental results indicate that soil preparation has a substantial influence on the pressure-sinkage relationship. The shearing mechanism was investigated by comparing traditional rotational shear with translational shear. The findings indicate that the shearing mechanism may explain the overprediction of shear strength typical of rotational shear tests. The shear contact area also exhibits a significant influence on the measured shear strength. Further investigation into the shear mechanism and size and shape of the shear contact area is recommended.
影响Bevameter土壤表征的因素
Bekker-Wong土-轮相互作用模型在地球力学界被广泛采用。这种方法需要用Bevameter测量数据。Bevameter试验包括压沉试验和抗剪强度试验。虽然Bevameter方法的初衷是密切复制车轮/轨道与土壤之间的相互作用,但通常在较低的垂直载荷和较小的接触面积下进行测试,以使测试保持在实际的实验限制范围内。传统的Bevameter抗剪强度试验,使用带滑轮的旋转剪切环,往往会高估车辆的拉杆拉力30 - 40% [(Chang和Baker, 1973, Shoop, 1993)]。平移剪切可以说更接近于发生在车轮/轨道和土壤之间的剪切机制。文献表明,地形力学研究受土壤条件和制备的显著影响。本研究研究了(a)制土对砂土压力沉降和剪切位移关系的影响,(b)剪切机制对抗剪强度的影响,(c)剪切接触面积对抗剪强度的影响。试验结果表明,整土对压沉关系有较大影响。通过对传统旋转剪切和平动剪切的比较,研究了剪切机理。研究结果表明,剪切机制可以解释旋转剪切试验中典型的抗剪强度高估。剪切接触面积对测得的抗剪强度也有显著影响。建议进一步研究剪切机制和剪切接触面积的大小和形状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信