{"title":"Fighting an indestructible monster","authors":"Juliane A. Lischka","doi":"10.1075/JLP.21031.LIS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nU.S. journalism during the Trump era has experienced numerous legitimacy attacks by the leading political figure. Building on the concepts of institutional legitimacy and intentional trust, this study analyzes legitimation narratives in projections of journalism’s future, using the Harvard University’s NiemanLab Predictions of Journalism from 2017 to 2021. Projectory narratives are meaningful constructions of a field’s future and provide guidance for its actors. The qualitative analysis of a Trump-related subset of predictions (ca. n = 130) convey (1) confrontational narratives of threat, self-reproach, and epistemological authority loss. Confrontational narratives serve to secure consent for suggested transparency and audience relationship building solutions. These (2) solution narratives represent trustification strategies. Lastly, (3) survival narratives aim at regaining authority and agency through legacy mythopoesis and the construction of a cautiously optimistic post-Trump outlook for journalism. Hence, the analysis of projectory narratives reveals how an organizational field collectively prepares for change to regain legitimacy.","PeriodicalId":167182,"journal":{"name":"Discourses of Fake News","volume":"7 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourses of Fake News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JLP.21031.LIS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
U.S. journalism during the Trump era has experienced numerous legitimacy attacks by the leading political figure. Building on the concepts of institutional legitimacy and intentional trust, this study analyzes legitimation narratives in projections of journalism’s future, using the Harvard University’s NiemanLab Predictions of Journalism from 2017 to 2021. Projectory narratives are meaningful constructions of a field’s future and provide guidance for its actors. The qualitative analysis of a Trump-related subset of predictions (ca. n = 130) convey (1) confrontational narratives of threat, self-reproach, and epistemological authority loss. Confrontational narratives serve to secure consent for suggested transparency and audience relationship building solutions. These (2) solution narratives represent trustification strategies. Lastly, (3) survival narratives aim at regaining authority and agency through legacy mythopoesis and the construction of a cautiously optimistic post-Trump outlook for journalism. Hence, the analysis of projectory narratives reveals how an organizational field collectively prepares for change to regain legitimacy.
在特朗普时代,美国新闻业经历了来自这位主要政治人物的多次合法性攻击。本研究以制度合法性和故意信任的概念为基础,利用哈佛大学尼曼实验室2017年至2021年的新闻业预测,分析了新闻业未来预测中的合法性叙事。投射叙事是对一个领域未来的有意义的建构,并为其参与者提供指导。对特朗普相关预测子集的定性分析(ca. n = 130)传达了(1)威胁、自责和认知论权威丧失的对抗性叙述。对抗性叙述有助于确保建议的透明度和受众关系建立解决方案的同意。这些(2)解决方案叙述代表了信任策略。最后,(3)生存叙事旨在通过遗产神话和构建谨慎乐观的后特朗普新闻前景来重新获得权威和代理。因此,对投射叙事的分析揭示了一个组织领域如何集体为变革做准备,以重新获得合法性。