Statistical Challenges for Quality Assessment of Smart Medical Devices

J. Sliwa
{"title":"Statistical Challenges for Quality Assessment of Smart Medical Devices","authors":"J. Sliwa","doi":"10.1109/3PGCIC.2015.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Connected medicine, using smart (software based and networked) medical devices is frequently presented as the major disruptive trend in health care. Such devices will however be broadly used only if they are \"prescribed\" by the hospitals as a part of a therapy and are reimbursed by the insurances. For this we need the proof of their safety, medical efficacy and economic efficiency. Aside of obligatory clinical trials we need an extensive system of post-market surveillance, because: a medical device is a part of a complex cyber-physical system, with humans in the loop / the environment cannot be sufficiently defined / humans react differently to the therapy, they also behave differently / after every software upgrade the device is not the same as before In their operation such devices generate huge amounts of data that can be reused for such analysis. Technically oriented people believe it can be done using a Big Data Analytics system without a deeper understanding of the underlying processes. It is doubtful if such approach can deliver useful results. The main problems seem to be: unbalanced cohort / various patient groups with various preferences / multiple quality parameters (basic algorithm, signal propagation, battery, security & privacy, obtrusiveness, etc.) / multiple variants (operating modes, device settings) / variability of the device and of the environment. When we transform data into \"actionable knowledge\", especially if the generated decisions influence human health, utmost care has to be applied. The goal of this paper is to present the complexity of the problem, warn against hasty, purely technical solutions, raise interest among specialists in health statistics and ignite an interdisciplinary cooperation to solve it.","PeriodicalId":395401,"journal":{"name":"2015 10th International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC)","volume":"23 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 10th International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/3PGCIC.2015.96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Connected medicine, using smart (software based and networked) medical devices is frequently presented as the major disruptive trend in health care. Such devices will however be broadly used only if they are "prescribed" by the hospitals as a part of a therapy and are reimbursed by the insurances. For this we need the proof of their safety, medical efficacy and economic efficiency. Aside of obligatory clinical trials we need an extensive system of post-market surveillance, because: a medical device is a part of a complex cyber-physical system, with humans in the loop / the environment cannot be sufficiently defined / humans react differently to the therapy, they also behave differently / after every software upgrade the device is not the same as before In their operation such devices generate huge amounts of data that can be reused for such analysis. Technically oriented people believe it can be done using a Big Data Analytics system without a deeper understanding of the underlying processes. It is doubtful if such approach can deliver useful results. The main problems seem to be: unbalanced cohort / various patient groups with various preferences / multiple quality parameters (basic algorithm, signal propagation, battery, security & privacy, obtrusiveness, etc.) / multiple variants (operating modes, device settings) / variability of the device and of the environment. When we transform data into "actionable knowledge", especially if the generated decisions influence human health, utmost care has to be applied. The goal of this paper is to present the complexity of the problem, warn against hasty, purely technical solutions, raise interest among specialists in health statistics and ignite an interdisciplinary cooperation to solve it.
智能医疗设备质量评估的统计挑战
使用智能(基于软件和联网的)医疗设备的互联医疗经常被认为是医疗保健领域的主要颠覆性趋势。但是,只有在医院“开处方”作为治疗的一部分并由保险公司报销的情况下,这种装置才能广泛使用。为此,我们需要证明它们的安全性、医疗功效和经济效益。除了强制性的临床试验,我们还需要一个广泛的上市后监测系统,因为:医疗设备是复杂的网络物理系统的一部分,人在循环中/环境不能充分定义/人对治疗的反应不同,他们的行为也不同/每次软件升级后,设备与以前不同在操作中,这些设备会产生大量的数据,这些数据可以重复用于此类分析。以技术为导向的人认为,无需深入了解底层流程,就可以使用大数据分析系统来完成。这种方法能否产生有用的结果令人怀疑。主要问题似乎是:不平衡的队列/具有不同偏好的不同患者群体/多个质量参数(基本算法、信号传播、电池、安全和隐私、突兀性等)/多个变体(操作模式、设备设置)/设备和环境的可变性。当我们将数据转化为"可付诸行动的知识"时,特别是在所产生的决定影响人类健康的情况下,必须极为谨慎。本文的目标是呈现问题的复杂性,警告不要草率地、纯技术性地解决问题,提高卫生统计专家的兴趣,并点燃跨学科合作来解决问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信