SHIELD: a data verification framework for participatory sensing systems

S. Gisdakis, Thanassis Giannetsos, Panos Papadimitratos
{"title":"SHIELD: a data verification framework for participatory sensing systems","authors":"S. Gisdakis, Thanassis Giannetsos, Panos Papadimitratos","doi":"10.1145/2766498.2766503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The openness of PS systems renders them vulnerable to malicious users that can pollute the measurement collection process, in an attempt to degrade the PS system data and, overall, its usefulness. Mitigating such adversarial behavior is hard. Cryptographic protection, authentication, authorization, and access control can help but they do not fully address the problem. Reports from faulty insiders (participants with credentials) can target the process intelligently, forcing the PS system to deviate from the actual sensed phenomenon. Filtering out those faulty reports is challenging, with practically no prior knowledge on the participants' trustworthiness, dynamically changing phenomena, and possibly large numbers of compromised devices. This paper proposes SHIELD, a novel data verification framework for PS systems that can complement any security architecture. SHIELD handles available, contradicting evidence, classifies efficiently incoming reports, and effectively separates and rejects those that are faulty. As a result, the deemed correct data can accurately represent the sensed phenomena, even when 45% of the reports are faulty, intelligently selected by coordinated adversaries and targeted optimally across the system's coverage area.","PeriodicalId":261845,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Security & Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks","volume":"28 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Security & Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2766498.2766503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

The openness of PS systems renders them vulnerable to malicious users that can pollute the measurement collection process, in an attempt to degrade the PS system data and, overall, its usefulness. Mitigating such adversarial behavior is hard. Cryptographic protection, authentication, authorization, and access control can help but they do not fully address the problem. Reports from faulty insiders (participants with credentials) can target the process intelligently, forcing the PS system to deviate from the actual sensed phenomenon. Filtering out those faulty reports is challenging, with practically no prior knowledge on the participants' trustworthiness, dynamically changing phenomena, and possibly large numbers of compromised devices. This paper proposes SHIELD, a novel data verification framework for PS systems that can complement any security architecture. SHIELD handles available, contradicting evidence, classifies efficiently incoming reports, and effectively separates and rejects those that are faulty. As a result, the deemed correct data can accurately represent the sensed phenomena, even when 45% of the reports are faulty, intelligently selected by coordinated adversaries and targeted optimally across the system's coverage area.
盾:参与式传感系统的数据验证框架
PS系统的开放性使它们容易受到恶意用户的攻击,恶意用户可能会污染测量收集过程,试图降低PS系统的数据及其总体用途。减轻这种对抗行为是困难的。加密保护、身份验证、授权和访问控制可以提供帮助,但它们不能完全解决问题。来自有缺陷的内部人员(具有凭据的参与者)的报告可以智能地针对流程,从而迫使PS系统偏离实际感知的现象。过滤掉这些错误的报告是具有挑战性的,因为实际上没有事先了解参与者的可信度,动态变化的现象,以及可能有大量受损的设备。本文提出了一种新的数据验证框架SHIELD,它可以补充任何安全体系结构。盾局处理可用的、相互矛盾的证据,有效地对收到的报告进行分类,并有效地分离和拒绝那些有缺陷的报告。因此,即使45%的报告是错误的,被认为是正确的数据也可以准确地代表感知到的现象,由协调的对手智能地选择,并在整个系统的覆盖范围内进行优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信