A novel one-sided push-out test for shear connectors in composite beams

Mohammed A. Al-Shuwaili, A. Palmeri, Maria Teresa Lombardo
{"title":"A novel one-sided push-out test for shear connectors in composite beams","authors":"Mohammed A. Al-Shuwaili, A. Palmeri, Maria Teresa Lombardo","doi":"10.4995/ASCCS2018.2018.7063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Push-out tests (POTs) have been widely exploited as an alternative to the more expensive full-scale bending tests to characterize the behaviour of shear connections in steel-concrete composite beams. In these tests, two concrete slabs are typically attached to a steel section with the connectors under investigation, which are then subjected to direct shear. The results allow quantifying the relationship between applied load and displacements at the steel-concrete interface. Since this relationship is highly influenced by the boundary conditions of POT samples, different experimental setups have been used, where the slabs are either restricted or free to slide horizontally, as researchers have tried to reduce any discrepancy between POT and full-scale composite beam testing. Based on a critical review of various POT configurations presented in the dedicated literature, this paper presents an efficient one-sided POT (OSPOT) method. While OSPOT and POT specimens are similar, in the proposed OPSPOT setup only one of the two slabs is directly loaded in each test, and the slab is free to move vertically. Thus, two results can be obtained from one specimen, i.e. one from each slab. A series of POTs and OSPOTs have been conducted to investigate the behaviour and the shear resistance of headed stud connectors through the two methods of testing. The results of this study than were compared with those of different POTs setups conducted by other researchers. The new OSPOT results show in general an excellent agreement with the analytical predictions offered by both British and European standards, as well as the estimated shear resistance proposed other researchers in the literature. These findings suggest that the proposed one-sided setup could be used as an efficient and economical option for conducting the POT, as it has the potential not only to double the number of results, but also to simplify the fabrication of the samples, which is important in any large experimental campaign, and to allow testing with limited capacity of the actuator. ","PeriodicalId":320267,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 12th international conference on Advances in Steel-Concrete Composite Structures - ASCCS 2018","volume":"32 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 12th international conference on Advances in Steel-Concrete Composite Structures - ASCCS 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/ASCCS2018.2018.7063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Push-out tests (POTs) have been widely exploited as an alternative to the more expensive full-scale bending tests to characterize the behaviour of shear connections in steel-concrete composite beams. In these tests, two concrete slabs are typically attached to a steel section with the connectors under investigation, which are then subjected to direct shear. The results allow quantifying the relationship between applied load and displacements at the steel-concrete interface. Since this relationship is highly influenced by the boundary conditions of POT samples, different experimental setups have been used, where the slabs are either restricted or free to slide horizontally, as researchers have tried to reduce any discrepancy between POT and full-scale composite beam testing. Based on a critical review of various POT configurations presented in the dedicated literature, this paper presents an efficient one-sided POT (OSPOT) method. While OSPOT and POT specimens are similar, in the proposed OPSPOT setup only one of the two slabs is directly loaded in each test, and the slab is free to move vertically. Thus, two results can be obtained from one specimen, i.e. one from each slab. A series of POTs and OSPOTs have been conducted to investigate the behaviour and the shear resistance of headed stud connectors through the two methods of testing. The results of this study than were compared with those of different POTs setups conducted by other researchers. The new OSPOT results show in general an excellent agreement with the analytical predictions offered by both British and European standards, as well as the estimated shear resistance proposed other researchers in the literature. These findings suggest that the proposed one-sided setup could be used as an efficient and economical option for conducting the POT, as it has the potential not only to double the number of results, but also to simplify the fabrication of the samples, which is important in any large experimental campaign, and to allow testing with limited capacity of the actuator. 
组合梁剪切连接件的单侧推出试验
推出试验(POTs)已被广泛利用作为一种替代更昂贵的全尺寸弯曲试验,以表征钢-混凝土组合梁的剪切连接的行为。在这些测试中,通常将两块混凝土板连接到钢截面上,并对连接件进行检查,然后对其进行直接剪切。结果允许量化在钢-混凝土界面施加的载荷和位移之间的关系。由于这种关系受到POT样品边界条件的高度影响,因此研究人员已经使用了不同的实验设置,其中板被限制或自由水平滑动,因为研究人员试图减少POT与全尺寸复合梁测试之间的任何差异。基于对各种专用文献中提出的POT配置的批判性回顾,本文提出了一种有效的单边POT (OSPOT)方法。虽然OSPOT和POT样品相似,但在建议的OPSPOT设置中,每次测试中只有两块板中的一块直接加载,并且板可以自由垂直移动。因此,从一个试样中可以得到两个结果,即从每个板中得到一个结果。通过两种测试方法,进行了一系列的pot和ospot来研究头螺柱连接器的行为和抗剪切能力。本研究的结果并与其他研究人员所进行的不同锅设置的结果进行了比较。总的来说,新的OSPOT结果与英国和欧洲标准提供的分析预测以及其他研究人员在文献中提出的估计剪切阻力非常一致。这些发现表明,所提出的单侧设置可以作为进行POT的有效和经济的选择,因为它不仅有可能使结果数量增加一倍,而且还可以简化样品的制作,这在任何大型实验活动中都很重要,并且允许在执行器容量有限的情况下进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信