Assessment of clinician’s knowledge and attitude toward health extension program in Ethiopia: An exploratory factor analysis

Merhawi Gebremedhin Tekle, Esie Gebrewahd Gebre, G. Medhin, A. Teklu, D. Tadesse, Genet Gebrehiwot, Sentayehu Tsegaye, Eskinder Wolka, Gebrehiwot Gebretsadik, C. DeGraff, Mihajlo Jakovljevic
{"title":"Assessment of clinician’s knowledge and attitude toward health extension program in Ethiopia: An exploratory factor analysis","authors":"Merhawi Gebremedhin Tekle, Esie Gebrewahd Gebre, G. Medhin, A. Teklu, D. Tadesse, Genet Gebrehiwot, Sentayehu Tsegaye, Eskinder Wolka, Gebrehiwot Gebretsadik, C. DeGraff, Mihajlo Jakovljevic","doi":"10.36922/ghes.0887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health extension workers (HEWs) are the primary implementers of the health extension program (HEP) – a government-led community-based health-care program, but clinicians are anticipated to play a critical part in providing extensive support, thus, this study aimed to assess clinicians’ knowledge and perceptions of HEP, a cross-sectional study was conducted with 1239 clinicians. A set of 54-item questions was created based on HEP guidelines and relevant literature. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified latent variables with Eigenvalues matrix >1. Cluster variables were derived through orthogonal varimax factor rotation, and internal reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. A composite score was generated for each constructed factor, and the associations between variables were determined using a one-way analysis of variance. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to eliminate confounders, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. EFA provides three factors explaining 91% of the total variance and labeled as “clinician-perceived attitude towards the skill of HEWs” (F1), “clinician knowledge on HEP activities” (F2), and “clinician-perceived attitude towards the impact of HEP” (F3). Internal reliability for the 54 items was 0.96, and it was 0.93, 0.90, and 0.89 for F1, F2, and F3, respectively. 75.5% and 76.2% of clinicians had favorable attitudes toward F1 and F3, respectively, and 70.2% had good knowledge of F2. F1 was positively correlated with participation in HEP review meetings, home visits, HEP outreach, and willingness to work in HEP but negatively correlated with degree holders. F2 was positively correlated with participation in HEP review meetings, home visits, being married, and non-medical doctors but negatively correlated with willingness to work in HEP, older age, female, and degree holder clinicians. Three factors, focusing on knowledge, skill, and the impact of HEP, were found and fall under the second-generation HEP framework. Therefore, strengthening HEP guidelines is essential to ensuring the delivery of sustainable and pro-poor HEP.","PeriodicalId":193088,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Economics and Sustainability","volume":"568 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Economics and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.0887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health extension workers (HEWs) are the primary implementers of the health extension program (HEP) – a government-led community-based health-care program, but clinicians are anticipated to play a critical part in providing extensive support, thus, this study aimed to assess clinicians’ knowledge and perceptions of HEP, a cross-sectional study was conducted with 1239 clinicians. A set of 54-item questions was created based on HEP guidelines and relevant literature. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified latent variables with Eigenvalues matrix >1. Cluster variables were derived through orthogonal varimax factor rotation, and internal reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. A composite score was generated for each constructed factor, and the associations between variables were determined using a one-way analysis of variance. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to eliminate confounders, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. EFA provides three factors explaining 91% of the total variance and labeled as “clinician-perceived attitude towards the skill of HEWs” (F1), “clinician knowledge on HEP activities” (F2), and “clinician-perceived attitude towards the impact of HEP” (F3). Internal reliability for the 54 items was 0.96, and it was 0.93, 0.90, and 0.89 for F1, F2, and F3, respectively. 75.5% and 76.2% of clinicians had favorable attitudes toward F1 and F3, respectively, and 70.2% had good knowledge of F2. F1 was positively correlated with participation in HEP review meetings, home visits, HEP outreach, and willingness to work in HEP but negatively correlated with degree holders. F2 was positively correlated with participation in HEP review meetings, home visits, being married, and non-medical doctors but negatively correlated with willingness to work in HEP, older age, female, and degree holder clinicians. Three factors, focusing on knowledge, skill, and the impact of HEP, were found and fall under the second-generation HEP framework. Therefore, strengthening HEP guidelines is essential to ensuring the delivery of sustainable and pro-poor HEP.
评估临床医生对健康推广计划的知识和态度:一个探索性因素分析
健康推广工作者(HEWs)是健康推广计划(HEP)的主要实施者,这是一项政府主导的社区卫生保健计划,但临床医生被期望在提供广泛支持方面发挥关键作用,因此,本研究旨在评估临床医生对HEP的知识和看法,对1239名临床医生进行了横断研究。根据HEP指南和相关文献编制了一套54题题。探索性因子分析(EFA)识别出特征值矩阵>1的潜在变量。聚类变量通过正交方差因子旋转导出,内部信度采用Cronbach’s alpha系数进行评估。为每个构建的因素生成一个综合评分,并使用单向方差分析确定变量之间的关联。采用多元线性回归分析消除混杂因素,P < 0.05为统计学显著性。EFA提供了三个因素,解释了91%的总方差,并标记为“临床医生对HEP技能的感知态度”(F1),“临床医生对HEP活动的知识”(F2)和“临床医生对HEP影响的感知态度”(F3)。54个条目的内部信度为0.96,F1、F2和F3的内部信度分别为0.93、0.90和0.89。75.5%和76.2%的临床医生对F1和F3有良好的态度,70.2%的临床医生对F2有良好的了解。F1与参与HEP审查会议、家访、HEP外展和在HEP工作的意愿呈正相关,但与学位持有者呈负相关。F2与参加HEP审查会议、家访、已婚和非医生呈正相关,但与HEP工作意愿、年龄较大、女性和持有学位的临床医生呈负相关。在第二代HEP框架下发现了三个因素,重点是知识、技能和HEP的影响。因此,加强HEP指导方针对于确保提供可持续和有利于穷人的HEP至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信