Management of construction and demolition waste in the Region of Waterloo

A. Button, Wonjong Lee, D. Marshall, Z. Dawood, Shawn MacLellan, H. Umali, S. Pagsuyoin
{"title":"Management of construction and demolition waste in the Region of Waterloo","authors":"A. Button, Wonjong Lee, D. Marshall, Z. Dawood, Shawn MacLellan, H. Umali, S. Pagsuyoin","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS.2014.6829900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the existing construction waste management program in the Region of Waterloo to identify strategies for increasing waste diversion rates. The construction industry is a major economic driver in the Province of Ontario but it is also one of the largest contributors to landfill usage. The industry generates a large amount of solid waste, of which only a small fraction is recycled. The diversion rate for construction waste is currently at 16%, which is significantly below the 60% target specified in the 2004 Ontario Waste Diversion Goals. In this study, diversion options are identified for six waste streams: wood, concrete, steel, drywall, asphalt, and shingles. An economic evaluation of the cost of recycling these materials was also performed. Research findings indicate that there is poor monitoring of construction waste management in the region. Recycling costs can be minimized by increasing diversion rates for four waste streams (concrete, steel, drywall, and asphalt) rather than by imposing 60% diversion across all streams. However, even with optimized diversion, there is little incentive for the construction industry to recycle - the minimum cost of 60% diversion is 15% more costly than landfilling options. An assessment of the landfill disposal fee structure is recommended to identify strategies for incentivising waste diversion; for example, imposing higher landfill fees may encourage higher waste diversion rates.","PeriodicalId":441073,"journal":{"name":"2014 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"21 15","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS.2014.6829900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the existing construction waste management program in the Region of Waterloo to identify strategies for increasing waste diversion rates. The construction industry is a major economic driver in the Province of Ontario but it is also one of the largest contributors to landfill usage. The industry generates a large amount of solid waste, of which only a small fraction is recycled. The diversion rate for construction waste is currently at 16%, which is significantly below the 60% target specified in the 2004 Ontario Waste Diversion Goals. In this study, diversion options are identified for six waste streams: wood, concrete, steel, drywall, asphalt, and shingles. An economic evaluation of the cost of recycling these materials was also performed. Research findings indicate that there is poor monitoring of construction waste management in the region. Recycling costs can be minimized by increasing diversion rates for four waste streams (concrete, steel, drywall, and asphalt) rather than by imposing 60% diversion across all streams. However, even with optimized diversion, there is little incentive for the construction industry to recycle - the minimum cost of 60% diversion is 15% more costly than landfilling options. An assessment of the landfill disposal fee structure is recommended to identify strategies for incentivising waste diversion; for example, imposing higher landfill fees may encourage higher waste diversion rates.
滑铁卢地区建筑和拆除废物的管理
本文考察了现有的建筑垃圾管理计划在滑铁卢地区,以确定战略,以提高废物转移率。建筑业是安大略省的主要经济驱动力,但它也是垃圾填埋场使用的最大贡献者之一。该行业产生大量固体废物,其中只有一小部分被回收利用。建筑废物的分流率目前为16%,远低于2004年安省废物分流目标所订明的60%的目标。在这项研究中,确定了六种废物流的转移选择:木材、混凝土、钢铁、干墙、沥青和瓦板。还对回收这些材料的成本进行了经济评估。研究结果表明,该地区对建筑废物管理的监测不足。通过提高四种废物流(混凝土、钢铁、干墙和沥青)的导流率,而不是在所有溪流中强制进行60%的导流,回收成本可以降到最低。然而,即使优化了废物的分流,建筑业也没有多少动力进行循环再造——分流60%的最低成本比堆填方案的成本高出15%。建议评估堆填区的收费结构,以确定鼓励废物转移的策略;例如,征收更高的堆填区费可能会鼓励更高的废物转移率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信