Billing and Coding Education and Knowledge Among Military Orthopaedic Surgeons

Matthew Mangini, Thomas C. Dowd, R. Cuenca
{"title":"Billing and Coding Education and Knowledge Among Military Orthopaedic Surgeons","authors":"Matthew Mangini, Thomas C. Dowd, R. Cuenca","doi":"10.55576/job.v2i2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current level of billing and coding knowledge among resident and staff military orthopaedic surgeons.\nDesign: Prospective survey, training, and assessment.\nSetting: Academic Military Level 1 Trauma Center.\nIntervention: Voluntary, anonymous survey relating to practice setting, billing, and coding practices, type of residency training and prior education on the subject. A quiz consisting of 23 questions to assess billing and coding knowledge.\nMain outcome measurement: Survey results and quiz scores.\nResults and conclusions: We had 68 responses comprised of 23 residents and 45 staff orthopaedic surgeons. Among residents, 86.14% (20/23) reported that they code encounters yet only 17.39% (4/23) responded that they have had formal training on billing and coding. 91.30% (21/23) felt that this topic should be taught in residency training. Among staff surgeons, 93.33% (42/45) code their own encounters and 42.22% (19/45) reported formal training on billing and coding. 93.33% (42/45) of staff felt that billing and coding should be taught in residency. The average quiz scores among residents and staff were 43.48% and 58.36%, respectively (p<0.0001). Scores among those with prior training in billing and coding were significantly higher overall (p= 0.033). Among staff there was no significant differences in scores related to years of experience, residency type, working with residents, years remaining in the military or participation in off-duty employment.\nConclusion: There remains a paucity of formal training on billing and coding among military orthopaedic surgeons and this problem is not unique to military orthopaedic residency training programs. Those with formal training in billing and coding performed significantly better than those without, indicating that formal billing and coding training as part of graduate medical education may be effective in improving billing and coding knowledge among military orthopaedic surgeons.\n Level of Evidence: IV; survey\nKeywords: Billing, Coding, Medical education, Practice management.","PeriodicalId":152360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Business","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55576/job.v2i2.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current level of billing and coding knowledge among resident and staff military orthopaedic surgeons. Design: Prospective survey, training, and assessment. Setting: Academic Military Level 1 Trauma Center. Intervention: Voluntary, anonymous survey relating to practice setting, billing, and coding practices, type of residency training and prior education on the subject. A quiz consisting of 23 questions to assess billing and coding knowledge. Main outcome measurement: Survey results and quiz scores. Results and conclusions: We had 68 responses comprised of 23 residents and 45 staff orthopaedic surgeons. Among residents, 86.14% (20/23) reported that they code encounters yet only 17.39% (4/23) responded that they have had formal training on billing and coding. 91.30% (21/23) felt that this topic should be taught in residency training. Among staff surgeons, 93.33% (42/45) code their own encounters and 42.22% (19/45) reported formal training on billing and coding. 93.33% (42/45) of staff felt that billing and coding should be taught in residency. The average quiz scores among residents and staff were 43.48% and 58.36%, respectively (p<0.0001). Scores among those with prior training in billing and coding were significantly higher overall (p= 0.033). Among staff there was no significant differences in scores related to years of experience, residency type, working with residents, years remaining in the military or participation in off-duty employment. Conclusion: There remains a paucity of formal training on billing and coding among military orthopaedic surgeons and this problem is not unique to military orthopaedic residency training programs. Those with formal training in billing and coding performed significantly better than those without, indicating that formal billing and coding training as part of graduate medical education may be effective in improving billing and coding knowledge among military orthopaedic surgeons.  Level of Evidence: IV; survey Keywords: Billing, Coding, Medical education, Practice management.
军队骨科医师的计费与编码教育与知识
目的:本研究的目的是评估当前住院和参谋部队骨科医生的计费和编码知识水平。设计:前瞻性调查、培训和评估。地点:学术军事一级创伤中心。干预:自愿,匿名调查有关实践设置,计费,编码实践,类型的住院医师培训和先前教育的主题。一个由23个问题组成的测试,以评估计费和编码知识。主要结果测量:调查结果和测验分数。结果和结论:我们收到了68份反馈,包括23名住院医师和45名骨科工作人员。在居民中,86.14%(20/23)的人表示他们遇到过编码,但只有17.39%(4/23)的人表示他们接受过正式的计费和编码培训。91.30%(21/23)的受访者认为该主题应在住院医师培训中教授。在工作人员中,93.33%(42/45)的医生自己编码,42.22%(19/45)的医生报告接受过正式的计费和编码培训。93.33%(42/45)的员工认为应该在住院医师中教授计费和编码。住院医师和工作人员的平均测验得分分别为43.48%和58.36% (p<0.0001)。先前接受过计费和编码培训的人的得分总体上显着更高(p= 0.033)。在工作人员中,与经验年数、住院医师类型、与住院医师一起工作、留在军队的年数或参加下班就业有关的得分没有显著差异。结论:军队骨科医师在计费和编码方面的正规培训仍然不足,这一问题并非军队骨科住院医师培训项目所独有。接受过正式计费与编码培训的军人表现明显优于未接受过正式计费与编码培训的军人,表明将正式计费与编码培训作为研究生医学教育的一部分可能有效提高军队骨科医师的计费与编码知识。证据等级:四级;关键词:计费;编码;医学教育;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信