The Political Dynamics on Development Process of Human Rights Cities: Lessons from South Korea and Indonesia

Zico Mulia
{"title":"The Political Dynamics on Development Process of Human Rights Cities: Lessons from South Korea and Indonesia","authors":"Zico Mulia","doi":"10.15642/ijps.2021.1.2.88-106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has not been a comparative study on the human rights cities in South Korea and Indonesia. Therefore, this paper conduct a comparative study of the dynamics within the development process of the human rights city in Gwangju and Wonosobo. This study explains how both cities flourished into Human Rights Cities using agenda-building theory. Moreover, this research elucidates the main actors and their respective roles in the development of both Human Rights Cities. Employing qualitative methods of data collection and analysis, this study found similarities and differences between the development processes of both Human Rights Cities. This article found that civil society organizations’ efforts were influential in the initiation stage in Gwangju. Meanwhile, in the case of Wonosobo, the concept of brandishing itself as a Human Rights City came from the Mayor. As a result, the top-down agenda-building process in Wonosobo took place faster than the development of the bottom-up human rights city of Gwangju.  ","PeriodicalId":275700,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Political Studies (IJPS)","volume":"59 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Political Studies (IJPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/ijps.2021.1.2.88-106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has not been a comparative study on the human rights cities in South Korea and Indonesia. Therefore, this paper conduct a comparative study of the dynamics within the development process of the human rights city in Gwangju and Wonosobo. This study explains how both cities flourished into Human Rights Cities using agenda-building theory. Moreover, this research elucidates the main actors and their respective roles in the development of both Human Rights Cities. Employing qualitative methods of data collection and analysis, this study found similarities and differences between the development processes of both Human Rights Cities. This article found that civil society organizations’ efforts were influential in the initiation stage in Gwangju. Meanwhile, in the case of Wonosobo, the concept of brandishing itself as a Human Rights City came from the Mayor. As a result, the top-down agenda-building process in Wonosobo took place faster than the development of the bottom-up human rights city of Gwangju.  
人权城市发展进程中的政治动力:来自韩国和印度尼西亚的经验
目前还没有对韩国和印度尼西亚的人权城市进行比较研究。因此,本文对光州人权城市与元罗浦人权城市发展过程中的动态进行了比较研究。本研究运用议程构建理论解释了这两个城市如何发展成为人权城市。此外,本研究还阐明了两个人权城市发展的主要参与者及其各自的作用。本研究采用定性的数据收集和分析方法,发现两个人权城市在发展过程中的异同。本文发现,在光州,市民社会组织的努力在启动阶段具有影响力。与此同时,就沃诺索博而言,将自己标榜为人权城市的概念来自市长。因此,上溯社自上而下的议程建设过程比自下而上的人权城市光州的发展速度要快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信