Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Results of Single Tooth Implants against Endodontic Treatment with Post and Crown Repair

Mohammad Ali Esmaeeli, E. Rafiei, Parisa Ranjbarian, Nasim Maghamipour
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Results of Single Tooth Implants against Endodontic Treatment with Post and Crown Repair","authors":"Mohammad Ali Esmaeeli, E. Rafiei, Parisa Ranjbarian, Nasim Maghamipour","doi":"10.18502/ijds.v18i2.10534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The choice between the two modes of treatment, endodontic treatment and single tooth implants are very different depending on the dentist, design, definition of successful outcomes, evaluation methods, and sample size. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of single tooth implants versus endodontic treatment with post and crown restoration in patients referred to the School of Dentistry of Islamic Azad University of Isfahan \nMaterials & Methods: In this cross-sectional analytical study in the academic year 2021, 90 (46 females and 44 males) patients after recording demographic information and medical status, during three different time intervals post treatment (under 3 years, 3 to 5 years and Over 5 years) were examined clinically and radiographically (periapical). Outcome of treatment was classified based on clinical and radiographic findings into three categories: successful, surviving and unsuccessful. Data were analyzed using Chi-squared test (α = 0.05). \nResults: In this study, 60% of women and 40% of men had endodontic treatment and 42.2% of women and 57.8% of men had single tooth implants. There was no significant difference between the treatment outcomes in the studied groups (p value > 0.521). There was no statistically significant relationship between gender and type of treatment as well as gender and treatment satisfaction (p value > 0.05). \nConclusion: Considering the preservation of natural teeth, if possible, root canal treatment is the main treatment of choice, otherwise a single-tooth implant can be a good alternative to missing or extracted teeth in terms of successful outcomes.","PeriodicalId":221865,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Isfahan Dental School","volume":" 18","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Isfahan Dental School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijds.v18i2.10534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The choice between the two modes of treatment, endodontic treatment and single tooth implants are very different depending on the dentist, design, definition of successful outcomes, evaluation methods, and sample size. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of single tooth implants versus endodontic treatment with post and crown restoration in patients referred to the School of Dentistry of Islamic Azad University of Isfahan Materials & Methods: In this cross-sectional analytical study in the academic year 2021, 90 (46 females and 44 males) patients after recording demographic information and medical status, during three different time intervals post treatment (under 3 years, 3 to 5 years and Over 5 years) were examined clinically and radiographically (periapical). Outcome of treatment was classified based on clinical and radiographic findings into three categories: successful, surviving and unsuccessful. Data were analyzed using Chi-squared test (α = 0.05). Results: In this study, 60% of women and 40% of men had endodontic treatment and 42.2% of women and 57.8% of men had single tooth implants. There was no significant difference between the treatment outcomes in the studied groups (p value > 0.521). There was no statistically significant relationship between gender and type of treatment as well as gender and treatment satisfaction (p value > 0.05). Conclusion: Considering the preservation of natural teeth, if possible, root canal treatment is the main treatment of choice, otherwise a single-tooth implant can be a good alternative to missing or extracted teeth in terms of successful outcomes.
单牙种植体对抗根管治疗后冠修复的临床与影像学结果比较
两种治疗模式,根管治疗和单牙种植体之间的选择是非常不同的,这取决于牙医、设计、成功结果的定义、评估方法和样本量。本研究的目的是比较在伊斯法罕伊斯兰阿扎德大学牙科学院就诊的患者,单牙种植体与根管治疗后冠修复的临床和影像学结果。在这项2021学年的横断面分析研究中,90名患者(46名女性,44名男性)在治疗后的三个不同时间间隔(3年以下,3至5年和5年以上)记录了人口统计信息和医疗状况,并进行了临床和放射学检查(根尖周)。治疗结果根据临床和影像学表现分为三类:成功、存活和不成功。资料采用卡方检验(α = 0.05)。结果:本研究中,60%的女性和40%的男性进行了根管治疗,42.2%的女性和57.8%的男性进行了单牙种植。两组治疗结果差异无统计学意义(p值> 0.521)。性别与治疗方式、性别与治疗满意度无统计学意义(p值> 0.05)。结论:考虑到保留天然牙,在可能的情况下,根管治疗是主要的治疗选择,否则单牙种植体可以很好地替代缺牙或拔牙的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信