AN EXPLORATORY EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF MOBILE HEALTH APPS

Aude Cabrera, M. Ranasinghe, Cedric Frossard, N. Postel-Vinay, C. Boyer
{"title":"AN EXPLORATORY EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF MOBILE HEALTH APPS","authors":"Aude Cabrera, M. Ranasinghe, Cedric Frossard, N. Postel-Vinay, C. Boyer","doi":"10.33965/icwi2019_201913l013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Owning a smartphone is now almost a given, and with smartphone use comes the benefit of access to a large pool of apps on every topic conceivable, including health. So, it is not surprising that mHealth apps development is on the rise, as is the use of mHealth apps. However, unlike apps intended for other purposes, the use of mHealth apps carry, not only the advantage of improved health but also the burdens of potential misuse, misleading content and possible security breach of personal data. In this paper, we attempt to evaluate the possible hazards of some of the most popular mHealth apps in app stores from France. Objectives: To (1) examine the top 10 most downloaded health apps in term of security and transparency of content (2) identify the trends of the most downloaded apps (3) to assess the applicability of the mHONcode guidelines to identify main issues on health apps (4) to describe the still main risks of health apps and (5) to propose basic rules to overcome them. Results: As expected, the 10 apps displayed varying degrees of quality and trustworthiness or lack thereof. Only 20% of the apps disclose the editorial team and the funding source. 80% of the apps use tracking tools such as analytics, crash reporting without prior consent or before the consent. 2 out of 10 apps did not used a https web address for health content and advertisement display. One app activates the location functionality without any justification in the app. end-user with trustworthy and quality tools to help in the management and maintenance of their healthcare.","PeriodicalId":270658,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on WWW/Internet 2019","volume":" 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on WWW/Internet 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/icwi2019_201913l013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Owning a smartphone is now almost a given, and with smartphone use comes the benefit of access to a large pool of apps on every topic conceivable, including health. So, it is not surprising that mHealth apps development is on the rise, as is the use of mHealth apps. However, unlike apps intended for other purposes, the use of mHealth apps carry, not only the advantage of improved health but also the burdens of potential misuse, misleading content and possible security breach of personal data. In this paper, we attempt to evaluate the possible hazards of some of the most popular mHealth apps in app stores from France. Objectives: To (1) examine the top 10 most downloaded health apps in term of security and transparency of content (2) identify the trends of the most downloaded apps (3) to assess the applicability of the mHONcode guidelines to identify main issues on health apps (4) to describe the still main risks of health apps and (5) to propose basic rules to overcome them. Results: As expected, the 10 apps displayed varying degrees of quality and trustworthiness or lack thereof. Only 20% of the apps disclose the editorial team and the funding source. 80% of the apps use tracking tools such as analytics, crash reporting without prior consent or before the consent. 2 out of 10 apps did not used a https web address for health content and advertisement display. One app activates the location functionality without any justification in the app. end-user with trustworthy and quality tools to help in the management and maintenance of their healthcare.
移动健康应用质量的探索性实证分析
导读:拥有一部智能手机现在几乎是一件理所当然的事,使用智能手机带来的好处是可以访问各种各样的应用程序,包括健康。因此,移动健康应用程序的开发和移动健康应用程序的使用都在增加,这并不奇怪。然而,与用于其他目的的应用程序不同,移动健康应用程序的使用不仅带来了改善健康的好处,也带来了潜在的滥用、误导性内容和可能的个人数据安全漏洞的负担。在本文中,我们试图评估法国应用商店中一些最受欢迎的移动健康应用程序可能存在的危害。目的:(1)检查下载次数最多的10个健康应用程序的安全性和内容透明度(2)确定下载次数最多的应用程序的趋势(3)评估mHONcode指南在识别健康应用程序主要问题方面的适用性(4)描述健康应用程序仍然存在的主要风险(5)提出克服这些问题的基本规则。结果:正如预期的那样,这10款应用表现出不同程度的质量和可信度,或者缺乏可信度。只有20%的应用程序披露了编辑团队和资金来源。80%的应用在未经用户同意或未经用户同意的情况下使用分析、崩溃报告等跟踪工具。10个应用程序中有2个没有使用HTTPS网址来显示健康内容和广告。一个应用程序无需任何理由就可以激活位置功能,最终用户可以使用值得信赖的高质量工具来帮助管理和维护他们的医疗保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信