The British Standard for (European Conformity[CE] Marked) Anti‐D: Its rarely discussed but important role in quantitating anti‐D in patient plasma

B. Fox, J. Hockley, L. Studholme
{"title":"The British Standard for (European Conformity[CE] Marked) Anti‐D: Its rarely discussed but important role in quantitating anti‐D in patient plasma","authors":"B. Fox, J. Hockley, L. Studholme","doi":"10.1111/tme.12649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Sir, The National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) has been issuing the British Standard for Anti-D, used to calibrate the AutoAnalyser for quantitation of anti-D in patient plasma, for some 40 years. Recently, whilst establishing the current 3rd British Standard (CE Marked) for anti-D in plasma, we realised that, although there are passing references in the literature, the origins and establishment of this standard have never been published. First, we would like to provide a historical overview of how the first working standard was originally established and, second, how it has evolved, by reporting on the collaborative study to establish the current 3rd British Standard (CE Marked) for anti-D in plasma. In October 1971, the Directors of the UK National Transfusion Centres decided that a national working standard for anti-D, for use in automated assay techniques, was required for routine use in hospitals. The candidate standard was prepared from 23 L of pooled citrated plasma containing incomplete (IgG) anti-D from donors in early, mid and late stages of immunisation. Plasma was recalcified, the clot removed and excess calcium absorbed on an ion-exchange resin, followed by 0.45 μm filtration into three separate containers for sterile storage. Subsequently, the material from each of the three containers was distributed (0.5 mL) into glass ampoules and lyophilised to generate three batches (NIBSC filling codes: 72/229; 73/515; and 73/517) and stored at −20 C. Analyses showed that each ampoule contained 0.58% residual moisture and 0.14% oxygen. The three batches of lyophilised material, described above, were distributed in a collaborative study with the aim to establish a British Working Standard. These candidates were assayed against the International Standard (IS; 64/19) for Anti-D Incomplete Blood Typing Serum using groups O, R1R1 and R2r cells on the AutoAnalyser by five UK clinical laboratories. The results showed that there was no difference between the dose-response curves of the three candidate batches of lyophilised material. Consequently, data for all three batches were pooled for each laboratory, and anti-D potencies, relative to the IS, were determined by parallel-line analysis. There were signs of differences with the slope of pooled candidate data, which tended to be steeper than that of the IS, although non-parallelism (P <0 .01) was only found in 2 of 80 assays, no more than would be expected by chance. Deviations from linearity were observed in 8 of 80 assays with a very small error, which was overcome by reducing the weights of these assays in the potency calculations. The potency estimates varied between laboratories. Two laboratories obtained potencies of 14 IU/ampoule, and the other three laboratories estimated around 10 IU/ampoule. The overall mean potency from all laboratories was 11.54 IU/ampoule (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.00-12.11). The discrepancy between laboratories was presumed to be a result of some variable in the assay system, which was not apparent from the information provided by the participants. There was, at the time, an immediate practical necessity to assign a universally acceptable value to the active content of one batch of proposed standard, and for this purpose, an overall mean potency from all laboratories was deemed adequate. Following this study, the 1st British Standard for Anti-D (Rh0) antibodies intended for use in the assay of plasma anti-D levels by the AutoAnalyser was established in 1975 with an assigned potency of 11.5 IU/ampoule and was coded 72/229. In 1988, when stocks of 72/229 were running low, it was proposed that 73/515 should replace 72/229 as it was prepared from the same plasma pool and was included in the original collaborative study described above. This time, four UK transfusion centres undertook to assay 73/515 against 72/229 using the AutoAnalyser, and the results of this study showed 73/515 to be indistinguishable from 72/229, with the potencies falling within the range of potencies obtained for the original collaborative study. To ensure continuity, in 1992, 73/515 was adopted as the 2nd British Standard for anti-D antibodies with an assigned potency of 11.5 IU/ampoule. In 2005, using the conformity assessment route, 73/515 was CE marked under Directive 98/79/EC on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and complied with the UK Guidelines for the Blood Transfusion Services. Most recently, a collaborative study was carried out involving three UK transfusion centres experienced in AutoAnalyser methodology to assess the stability of anti-D in lyophilised preparation 73/517 and its suitability to replace the CE-marked standard (73/515). Each participant was provided with two ampoules of 73/515 (stored at −20 C since lyophilisation) and eight ampoules of 73/517 (two of each stored at −70 C, −20 C, +4 C and +20 C for 11 years prior to assay). They were required to reconstitute, on the day of assay, one Received: 14 August 2019 Revised: 26 September 2019 Accepted: 1 November 2019 DOI: 10.1111/tme.12649","PeriodicalId":442504,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" 500","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.12649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dear Sir, The National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) has been issuing the British Standard for Anti-D, used to calibrate the AutoAnalyser for quantitation of anti-D in patient plasma, for some 40 years. Recently, whilst establishing the current 3rd British Standard (CE Marked) for anti-D in plasma, we realised that, although there are passing references in the literature, the origins and establishment of this standard have never been published. First, we would like to provide a historical overview of how the first working standard was originally established and, second, how it has evolved, by reporting on the collaborative study to establish the current 3rd British Standard (CE Marked) for anti-D in plasma. In October 1971, the Directors of the UK National Transfusion Centres decided that a national working standard for anti-D, for use in automated assay techniques, was required for routine use in hospitals. The candidate standard was prepared from 23 L of pooled citrated plasma containing incomplete (IgG) anti-D from donors in early, mid and late stages of immunisation. Plasma was recalcified, the clot removed and excess calcium absorbed on an ion-exchange resin, followed by 0.45 μm filtration into three separate containers for sterile storage. Subsequently, the material from each of the three containers was distributed (0.5 mL) into glass ampoules and lyophilised to generate three batches (NIBSC filling codes: 72/229; 73/515; and 73/517) and stored at −20 C. Analyses showed that each ampoule contained 0.58% residual moisture and 0.14% oxygen. The three batches of lyophilised material, described above, were distributed in a collaborative study with the aim to establish a British Working Standard. These candidates were assayed against the International Standard (IS; 64/19) for Anti-D Incomplete Blood Typing Serum using groups O, R1R1 and R2r cells on the AutoAnalyser by five UK clinical laboratories. The results showed that there was no difference between the dose-response curves of the three candidate batches of lyophilised material. Consequently, data for all three batches were pooled for each laboratory, and anti-D potencies, relative to the IS, were determined by parallel-line analysis. There were signs of differences with the slope of pooled candidate data, which tended to be steeper than that of the IS, although non-parallelism (P <0 .01) was only found in 2 of 80 assays, no more than would be expected by chance. Deviations from linearity were observed in 8 of 80 assays with a very small error, which was overcome by reducing the weights of these assays in the potency calculations. The potency estimates varied between laboratories. Two laboratories obtained potencies of 14 IU/ampoule, and the other three laboratories estimated around 10 IU/ampoule. The overall mean potency from all laboratories was 11.54 IU/ampoule (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.00-12.11). The discrepancy between laboratories was presumed to be a result of some variable in the assay system, which was not apparent from the information provided by the participants. There was, at the time, an immediate practical necessity to assign a universally acceptable value to the active content of one batch of proposed standard, and for this purpose, an overall mean potency from all laboratories was deemed adequate. Following this study, the 1st British Standard for Anti-D (Rh0) antibodies intended for use in the assay of plasma anti-D levels by the AutoAnalyser was established in 1975 with an assigned potency of 11.5 IU/ampoule and was coded 72/229. In 1988, when stocks of 72/229 were running low, it was proposed that 73/515 should replace 72/229 as it was prepared from the same plasma pool and was included in the original collaborative study described above. This time, four UK transfusion centres undertook to assay 73/515 against 72/229 using the AutoAnalyser, and the results of this study showed 73/515 to be indistinguishable from 72/229, with the potencies falling within the range of potencies obtained for the original collaborative study. To ensure continuity, in 1992, 73/515 was adopted as the 2nd British Standard for anti-D antibodies with an assigned potency of 11.5 IU/ampoule. In 2005, using the conformity assessment route, 73/515 was CE marked under Directive 98/79/EC on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and complied with the UK Guidelines for the Blood Transfusion Services. Most recently, a collaborative study was carried out involving three UK transfusion centres experienced in AutoAnalyser methodology to assess the stability of anti-D in lyophilised preparation 73/517 and its suitability to replace the CE-marked standard (73/515). Each participant was provided with two ampoules of 73/515 (stored at −20 C since lyophilisation) and eight ampoules of 73/517 (two of each stored at −70 C, −20 C, +4 C and +20 C for 11 years prior to assay). They were required to reconstitute, on the day of assay, one Received: 14 August 2019 Revised: 26 September 2019 Accepted: 1 November 2019 DOI: 10.1111/tme.12649
英国标准(欧洲合格[CE]标志)抗- D:它很少被讨论,但在定量患者血浆中抗- D的重要作用
尊敬的先生,国家生物标准与控制研究所(NIBSC)已经发布了英国抗- d标准,用于校准用于患者血浆中抗- d定量的自动分析仪,大约40年了。最近,在建立血浆中抗d的现行第三个英国标准(CE标志)时,我们意识到,尽管文献中有通过的参考文献,但该标准的起源和建立从未公布过。首先,我们想提供第一个工作标准最初是如何建立的历史概述,其次,它是如何演变的,通过报告合作研究建立目前的第三个英国血浆中抗d标准(CE标志)。1971年10月,联合王国国家输血中心主任决定,需要一项用于自动化验技术的抗- d国家工作标准,供医院常规使用。候选标准品由23 L混合柠檬酸血浆制备,这些血浆中含有免疫早期、中期和晚期供者的不完全IgG抗- d抗体。将血浆重新钙化,除去凝块,并用离子交换树脂吸收多余的钙,然后将0.45 μm过滤到三个单独的容器中进行无菌储存。随后,将三个容器中的材料(0.5 mL)分配到玻璃安瓿中并冻干,生成三批(NIBSC填充代码:72/229;73/515;和73/517),保存在- 20℃。分析表明,每个安瓿含有0.58%的残余水分和0.14%的氧气。上述三批冻干材料是在一项旨在建立英国工作标准的合作研究中分发的。将这些候选物与国际标准(IS;64/19)的抗- d不完全血型血清使用组O, R1R1和R2r细胞在autoanalyzer由五个英国临床实验室。结果表明,3个候选批次冻干物质的剂量响应曲线没有差异。因此,将所有三个批次的数据汇集到每个实验室,并通过平行线分析确定相对于IS的抗d效价。合并候选数据的斜率有差异的迹象,倾向于比IS的斜率更陡,尽管非平行性(P < 0.01)仅在80项分析中的2项中被发现,不超过偶然预期。80个测定中有8个测定存在线性偏差,误差很小,通过减少这些测定在效价计算中的权重来克服。不同实验室对其效力的估计各不相同。两个实验室获得的效力为14国际单位/安瓿,其他三个实验室估计约为10国际单位/安瓿。所有实验室的总体平均效价为11.54 IU/安瓿(95%可信区间[CI]: 11.00-12.11)。实验室之间的差异被认为是化验系统中某些变量的结果,这从参与者提供的信息中并不明显。当时,有一个直接的实际需要,即指定一个普遍可接受的值给一批拟议标准的有效含量,为此目的,所有实验室的总体平均效价被认为是足够的。在这项研究之后,第一个英国抗d (Rh0)抗体标准于1975年建立,用于AutoAnalyser测定血浆抗d水平,指定效价为11.5 IU/安瓿,编码为72/229。1988年,当72/229的库存不足时,有人建议用73/515代替72/229,因为它是从同一血浆池中制备的,并且被纳入了上述最初的合作研究。这一次,四家英国输血中心使用autoanalyzer对73/515和72/229进行了检测,研究结果显示73/515与72/229无法区分,效力在原始合作研究中获得的效力范围内。为了确保连续性,1992年,73/515被采用为抗d抗体的第二个英国标准,指定效价为11.5 IU/安瓿。2005年,通过合格评定途径,73/515根据体外诊断医疗设备指令98/79/EC获得了CE标志,并符合英国输血服务指南。最近,一项涉及三家英国输血中心的合作研究进行了autoanalyzer方法,以评估冻干制剂73/517中的抗d的稳定性及其替代ce标志标准(73/515)的适用性。每位参与者提供2安瓿73/515(冷冻后保存在- 20℃)和8安瓿73/517(检测前分别保存在- 70℃、- 20℃、+4℃和+20℃11年)。 他们被要求在试验当天重组一个。收稿日期:2019年8月14日修订日期:2019年9月26日接受日期:2019年11月1日DOI: 10.1111/ time .12649
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信