The Relationship Between Human Basic (Human Rights) Obligations and Human Rights

Try Widiyono, Hamdan Azhar Siregar
{"title":"The Relationship Between Human Basic (Human Rights) Obligations and Human Rights","authors":"Try Widiyono, Hamdan Azhar Siregar","doi":"10.2991/aebmr.k.200226.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many discussions of Human Rights, it is rarely related to Human Basic (human rights) obligations. In fact, they complement each other to find justice. In the Greco-Roman era and the Middle Ages, the development of the School of irrational natural law laid the basis for obligations for humans that were rooted in metaphysics and divine values. When individual expressions are blazing, which is a feature of the renaissance, it changes fromobligations to rights. The teachings of Aquinas (1224-1274), Hugo Grotius (1583-1645), Magna Charta (1215), Human Rights Petition (1628), British Human Rights Statement (1689), United States Declaration of Independence (1776) and the French revolution (1789) are the pieces of evidence for this shift. The change in the rationale is contradictory, so that between obligations and rights seems to have a conflict. Therefore, it is relevant to raise a question, namely how human rights were born and developed and how the relationship between human rights and human basic (human rights) obligations. The theory in analyzing the problems raised in this study uses the theory of balance and the theory of justice. While the methodology used in this study is the normative method of the law. The results obtained in this study in addition to providing answers to the problems raised also provide future direction, namely what should be done.","PeriodicalId":300116,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Law Reform (INCLAR 2019)","volume":" 1171","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Law Reform (INCLAR 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200226.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many discussions of Human Rights, it is rarely related to Human Basic (human rights) obligations. In fact, they complement each other to find justice. In the Greco-Roman era and the Middle Ages, the development of the School of irrational natural law laid the basis for obligations for humans that were rooted in metaphysics and divine values. When individual expressions are blazing, which is a feature of the renaissance, it changes fromobligations to rights. The teachings of Aquinas (1224-1274), Hugo Grotius (1583-1645), Magna Charta (1215), Human Rights Petition (1628), British Human Rights Statement (1689), United States Declaration of Independence (1776) and the French revolution (1789) are the pieces of evidence for this shift. The change in the rationale is contradictory, so that between obligations and rights seems to have a conflict. Therefore, it is relevant to raise a question, namely how human rights were born and developed and how the relationship between human rights and human basic (human rights) obligations. The theory in analyzing the problems raised in this study uses the theory of balance and the theory of justice. While the methodology used in this study is the normative method of the law. The results obtained in this study in addition to providing answers to the problems raised also provide future direction, namely what should be done.
人的基本(人权)义务与人权的关系
在许多关于人权的讨论中,很少涉及人的基本(人权)义务。事实上,他们相辅相成,以寻求正义。在希腊罗马时代和中世纪,非理性自然法学派的发展为人类的义务奠定了基础,这种义务植根于形而上学和神圣的价值观。当个人的表达被点燃时,这是文艺复兴的一个特征,它从义务变成了权利。阿奎那(1224-1274)、雨果·格劳秀斯(1583-1645)、《大宪章》(1215)、《人权请愿书》(1628)、英国《人权宣言》(1689)、美国《独立宣言》(1776)和法国大革命(1789)都是这种转变的证据。这种变化的理据是矛盾的,使义务与权利之间似乎产生了冲突。因此,有必要提出一个问题,即人权是如何产生和发展的,以及人权与人的基本(人权)义务之间的关系如何。在分析本研究提出的问题时,运用了平衡理论和公正理论。而本研究使用的方法论是法律的规范性方法。本研究所得的结果除了对提出的问题提供答案外,还提供了未来的方向,即应该做什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信