The Hellenic Literary Society at Constantinople between Ottomanism and Greek Irredentism

Artemis Papatheodorou
{"title":"The Hellenic Literary Society at Constantinople between Ottomanism and Greek Irredentism","authors":"Artemis Papatheodorou","doi":"10.53979/yillik.2022.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"… the Turks, public servants or soldiers, remained in sum what they’ve always been, Barbarians making a life out of plunder and robbery...\" The above statement reveals how one of the finest institutions of Ottoman Greek letters and sciences, the Hellenic Literary Society at Constantinople, described the Turks in a petition to its honorary members, academics, university professors, and learned societies in the Allied countries and in those that had remained neutral during the Great War, just a month into the deliberations of the Paris Peace Conference in 1919. The picture of the Turk as a barbarian permeates the petition and juxtaposes that of the Greek as the bearer of civilization. In this way, the society attempted to elicit the support of Western intellectuals in favor of Greek irredentism. Such an approach was not unique to the Ottoman Greeks, as Armenians also employed a similar distinction between the Turks and themselves to enhance their national aspirations.2 Yet, such a snapshot of the society in the post-Armistice period can be misleading as to its sixty-odd year-long lifetime. The society had remained, for the most part, in favor of Ottomanism, and its endorsement of Greek irredentism tells us more about how and why multi-ethnic and multi-cultural empires can fail rather than providing an accurate depiction of the society throughout its existence.","PeriodicalId":430972,"journal":{"name":"Istanbul Research Institute","volume":"123 22","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istanbul Research Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53979/yillik.2022.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"… the Turks, public servants or soldiers, remained in sum what they’ve always been, Barbarians making a life out of plunder and robbery..." The above statement reveals how one of the finest institutions of Ottoman Greek letters and sciences, the Hellenic Literary Society at Constantinople, described the Turks in a petition to its honorary members, academics, university professors, and learned societies in the Allied countries and in those that had remained neutral during the Great War, just a month into the deliberations of the Paris Peace Conference in 1919. The picture of the Turk as a barbarian permeates the petition and juxtaposes that of the Greek as the bearer of civilization. In this way, the society attempted to elicit the support of Western intellectuals in favor of Greek irredentism. Such an approach was not unique to the Ottoman Greeks, as Armenians also employed a similar distinction between the Turks and themselves to enhance their national aspirations.2 Yet, such a snapshot of the society in the post-Armistice period can be misleading as to its sixty-odd year-long lifetime. The society had remained, for the most part, in favor of Ottomanism, and its endorsement of Greek irredentism tells us more about how and why multi-ethnic and multi-cultural empires can fail rather than providing an accurate depiction of the society throughout its existence.
奥斯曼主义与希腊统一主义之间君士坦丁堡的希腊文学协会
“……土耳其人,无论是公务人员还是士兵,都和从前一样,是靠掠夺和抢劫为生的野蛮人……”上述陈述揭示了奥斯曼希腊文学和科学最好的机构之一,君士坦丁堡的希腊文学协会,是如何在一份请愿书中描述土耳其人的,该请愿书是在1919年巴黎和会讨论仅仅一个月的时候,向协约国和一战期间保持中立的盟国的荣誉会员、学者、大学教授和学术团体提交的。土耳其人作为野蛮人的形象渗透在请愿书中,并与希腊人作为文明的承担者的形象并列。通过这种方式,该协会试图获得西方知识分子对希腊民族统一主义的支持。这种做法并不是奥斯曼希腊人所独有的,因为亚美尼亚人也采用类似的区分土耳其人和他们自己的方法来增强他们的民族愿望然而,这样一个战后社会的快照可能会误导其60多年的寿命。这个社会在很大程度上仍然支持奥斯曼主义,它对希腊民族统一主义的认可更多地告诉我们,多民族和多文化的帝国是如何以及为什么会失败的,而不是提供一个贯穿其存在的社会的准确描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信