Using Bad Data

G. Smith, J. Cordes
{"title":"Using Bad Data","authors":"G. Smith, J. Cordes","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198844396.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Good data scientists consider the reliability of the data, while data clowns don’t. Reported data sometimes systematically misrepresent the phenomena being recorded. Data can be deformed by extremely unusual data—outliers—which can be clerical errors, measurement errors, or flukes that can mislead us if not corrected. Other times, outliers are valuable data. We should always consider if data are skewed by unusual events or distorted by unreported “silent data.” If something is surprising about top-ranked groups, look at the bottom-ranked groups. Consider the possibility of survivorship bias and self-selection bias. Incomplete, inaccurate, or unreliable data can make clowns out of anyone.","PeriodicalId":331229,"journal":{"name":"The 9 Pitfalls of Data Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 9 Pitfalls of Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198844396.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Good data scientists consider the reliability of the data, while data clowns don’t. Reported data sometimes systematically misrepresent the phenomena being recorded. Data can be deformed by extremely unusual data—outliers—which can be clerical errors, measurement errors, or flukes that can mislead us if not corrected. Other times, outliers are valuable data. We should always consider if data are skewed by unusual events or distorted by unreported “silent data.” If something is surprising about top-ranked groups, look at the bottom-ranked groups. Consider the possibility of survivorship bias and self-selection bias. Incomplete, inaccurate, or unreliable data can make clowns out of anyone.
使用坏数据
优秀的数据科学家会考虑数据的可靠性,而数据小丑则不会。报告的数据有时会系统性地歪曲所记录的现象。数据可能会被极不寻常的数据异常值所扭曲,这些异常值可能是文书错误、测量错误或侥幸,如果不加以纠正,可能会误导我们。其他时候,异常值是有价值的数据。我们应该始终考虑数据是否因异常事件或未报告的“沉默数据”而扭曲。如果说排名靠前的群体有什么令人惊讶的地方,那就看看排名靠后的群体吧。考虑生存偏差和自我选择偏差的可能性。不完整、不准确或不可靠的数据会让任何人变成小丑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信