Evaluation of Instructional and User Interface Design for MOOC: Short and Free FutureLearn Courses

Tinna Fauziah Azhar, Kasiyah, H. Santoso
{"title":"Evaluation of Instructional and User Interface Design for MOOC: Short and Free FutureLearn Courses","authors":"Tinna Fauziah Azhar, Kasiyah, H. Santoso","doi":"10.1109/ICACSIS47736.2019.8979754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MOOC is an online learning course that can be attended by students in large numbers and has spread throughout the world. This study is focused on one MOOC platform, FutureLearn. FutureLearn claims that several effective learning principles have already been applied to its courses. There is now a need to evaluate how effective the courses offered by FutureLearn are in terms of instructional design, user interface, and usability. So far, the study of FutureLearn that focuses on instructional design, user interface, and usability is still limited. In this study, 310 respondents living in Indonesia participated in an online survey. 30 respondents who were FutureLearn users evaluated the usability of FutureLearn using the E-Learning Usability Scale (EUS). Furthermore, 10 participants were selected to take part in usability testing sessions. The study shows that there were instructional design and user interface principles in FutureLearn which not applied. in FutureLearn. Furthermore, there are several pages or components recommended to be improved: the flow of joining course after improvement, course search by the category page, and the course info page. Based on the usability evaluation, the participants found every feature in the recommendations based on alternative design improvement are helpful.","PeriodicalId":165090,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and information Systems (ICACSIS)","volume":"7 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and information Systems (ICACSIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACSIS47736.2019.8979754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

MOOC is an online learning course that can be attended by students in large numbers and has spread throughout the world. This study is focused on one MOOC platform, FutureLearn. FutureLearn claims that several effective learning principles have already been applied to its courses. There is now a need to evaluate how effective the courses offered by FutureLearn are in terms of instructional design, user interface, and usability. So far, the study of FutureLearn that focuses on instructional design, user interface, and usability is still limited. In this study, 310 respondents living in Indonesia participated in an online survey. 30 respondents who were FutureLearn users evaluated the usability of FutureLearn using the E-Learning Usability Scale (EUS). Furthermore, 10 participants were selected to take part in usability testing sessions. The study shows that there were instructional design and user interface principles in FutureLearn which not applied. in FutureLearn. Furthermore, there are several pages or components recommended to be improved: the flow of joining course after improvement, course search by the category page, and the course info page. Based on the usability evaluation, the participants found every feature in the recommendations based on alternative design improvement are helpful.
MOOC教学与用户界面设计评估:短期免费FutureLearn课程
MOOC是一种可以让大量学生参加的在线学习课程,已经遍布全球。这项研究的重点是一个MOOC平台,FutureLearn。FutureLearn声称,一些有效的学习原则已经应用到它的课程中。现在有必要评估FutureLearn提供的课程在教学设计、用户界面和可用性方面的有效性。到目前为止,FutureLearn对教学设计、用户界面和可用性的研究仍然有限。在这项研究中,生活在印度尼西亚的310名受访者参加了一项在线调查。30名受访者是FutureLearn的用户,他们使用电子学习可用性量表(EUS)评估了FutureLearn的可用性。此外,10名参与者被选中参加可用性测试环节。研究表明,FutureLearn中的教学设计和用户界面原则并不适用。在FutureLearn。此外,还有几个页面或组件建议改进:改进后的加入课程流程,按类别页面搜索课程,课程信息页面。基于可用性评估,参与者发现基于备选设计改进的建议中的每个特性都是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信