A collaborative study on a new quantitative suspension test, the in vitro test, for the evaluation of the bactericidal activity of chemical disinfectants.

G Reybrouck, J Borneff, H van de Voorde, H P Werner
{"title":"A collaborative study on a new quantitative suspension test, the in vitro test, for the evaluation of the bactericidal activity of chemical disinfectants.","authors":"G Reybrouck,&nbsp;J Borneff,&nbsp;H van de Voorde,&nbsp;H P Werner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a collaborative study on a new quantitative suspension test for the evaluation of the bactericidal activity of chemical disinfectants, three laboratories performed the in vitro test on a phenol and an aldehyde standard in the critical use dilutions using Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as test organisms. The most striking finding was that the means of the germidical effect of one laboratory were significant lower than those of both others. Nevertheless the dispersion of the results did not differ among the laboratories. The differences could not be attributed to the subculture technique followed, nor to the daily inconstancy of the bacterial suspension resistance. The only feature that could explain the difference was the assessment of the microbiological work in itself. It should be stated, however, that the variance of the germicidal-effect values were rather low for this kind of microbiological work, so that differences between laboratories were significant even if the absolute values differed less than 1 unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":76867,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene. Erste Abteilung Originale. Reihe B: Hygiene, Betriebshygiene, praventive Medizin","volume":"168 5-6","pages":"463-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene. Erste Abteilung Originale. Reihe B: Hygiene, Betriebshygiene, praventive Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a collaborative study on a new quantitative suspension test for the evaluation of the bactericidal activity of chemical disinfectants, three laboratories performed the in vitro test on a phenol and an aldehyde standard in the critical use dilutions using Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as test organisms. The most striking finding was that the means of the germidical effect of one laboratory were significant lower than those of both others. Nevertheless the dispersion of the results did not differ among the laboratories. The differences could not be attributed to the subculture technique followed, nor to the daily inconstancy of the bacterial suspension resistance. The only feature that could explain the difference was the assessment of the microbiological work in itself. It should be stated, however, that the variance of the germicidal-effect values were rather low for this kind of microbiological work, so that differences between laboratories were significant even if the absolute values differed less than 1 unit.

一种评价化学消毒剂杀菌活性的新型定量悬液试验——体外试验的合作研究。
在一项评价化学消毒剂杀菌活性的新型定量悬浮试验的合作研究中,三个实验室以金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌为试验生物,在关键使用稀释度下对苯酚和醛标准进行了体外试验。最引人注目的发现是,一个实验室的杀菌效果显著低于其他两个实验室。然而,结果在不同实验室间的分布并无差异。这种差异不能归因于继代培养技术,也不能归因于细菌悬浮液抗性的日常变化。唯一可以解释这种差异的特征是对微生物工作本身的评估。但需要说明的是,对于这类微生物工作,杀菌效果值的差异很小,因此即使绝对值相差不到1个单位,实验室之间的差异也是显著的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信